www.NewsOfTheWorld.bz  NEWS OF THE WORLD www.NOTW.bz
Established 1843 'the only  newspaper in the world bringing  real news without fear or favour...
'Email contacts NEWS OF THE WORLD : admin@NOTW.bz    news@NOTW.bz  MrWijat@NOTW.bz

IndependantMurdochNews

International News Limited Domain 
Pricing Per Year
.com* $9.99  | .net* $9.99  | .org* $9.99  | .info* $9.99  | .us* $9.99  | .biz* $9.99  | 
.ws* $9.99 
 | 
.name* $9.99 
Save even more on multi-year registrations! 

Visit International News Limited  for the best values on: domain names , domain transfers
  and more
!
l
WWW.INLNEWS.COM  WWW.INLTV.COM  INL.ORG   INL.GOV   INL.CO.NZ  WWW.AWN.COM  
WWW.AWNTV.COM  
INLNews  YahooMail  HotMail  GMail AOLMail  MyWayMail USA MAIL
USA Weekly News EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE  
Visit International News Limited  for the best values on:  domain names 
. 
Fringe Shows Have Talent   Bebo    YouTube    MySpace    Twitter  FaceBook.  
USA Weekly News EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE  

Click For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores 
Triumph of Truth (Who's Watching The Watchers?) 7 Volumes - The Australian Weekend  
Click here to get you daily dose of  Real  Independent USA News with Amy Goodman at Domocracy Now
 CNNWorld   IsraelVideoNs   INLNs NYTimes   WashNs   
WorldMedia   JapanNs   AusNs  WorldVideoNs   
WorldFinance   ChinaDaily 
 IndiaNs   USADaily   BBC   EuroNs ABCAust   WANs   NZNs 
 QldNs   MelbAge AdelaideNs   TasNs 
  ABCTas   DarwinNs  USAMail

Rupert Murdoch.Rupert Murdoch.Photo: World Economic Forum

CLIMATE & ENERGY

Could Murdoch’s News Corp be behind Climategate too?

There have been countless independent investigations into the scientists whose emails were hacked in November 2009. And the scientists have been (quietly) vindicated every time.

But we still don't know who hacked the emails! And now we know that one of the key investigative bodies tasked with tracking down the hackers -- Scotland Yard -- was compromised at the time.

How were they compromised? Neil Wallis -- the former News of the World executive editor -- became a "£1,000 ($1,613) a day" consultant to Scotland Yard in October 2009. Last week, he became the ninth person arrested in the metastasizing News Corporation scandal "on suspicion of conspiring to intercept communications, contrary to section 1(1) Criminal Law Act 1977."

Certainly Wallis had plenty of motive to join Scotland Yard just to keep an eye on the investigation into the phone-hacking scandal. Indeed, The New York Times reports Wallis "was reporting back to News International while he was working for the police on the hacking case." But this also suggests how corrupt Wallis was -- and how corrupted Scotland Yard was.

In the light of the News Corp phone-hacking scandal, it is clear that Murdoch's outfit had means, motive, and opportunity for the Climategate email hacking. News Corp certainly has a history of defaming climate scientists and a penchant for hacking.

Indeed, in this country, a division of News Corp had a federal case brought against it for "hacking its way into Floorgraphics's password protected computer system." The complaint said News America had "illegally accessed plaintiff's computer system and obtained proprietary information" and "disseminated false, misleading and malicious information about the plaintiff." Sounds familiar, no?

After a few days of testimony, News Corp "settled with Floorgraphics for $29.5 million and then, days later, bought it, even though it reportedly had sales of less than $1 million." This behavior simply wasn't a big shock to News Corp.

So News Corp would obviously now be on the top of anybody's short list of possible suspects in the Climategate hacking. At the same time, we now know things were so cozy between News Corp, Wallis, and Scotland Yard that it is hard to believe News Corp would have been thoroughly investigated for Climategate, if they were investigated at all.

How cozy? Staff at News Corp's News of the World tabloid apparently routinely paid off members of the Metropolitan Police Service, aka Scotland Yard -- payments that were "condoned" by then-editor Andy Coulson, who later became chief spokesman for Prime Minister David Cameron.

How cozy? The Guardian dropped this bombshell Friday: "Scotland Yard's most senior officers tried to convince the Guardian during two private meetings that its coverage of phone hacking was exaggerated and incorrect without revealing they had hired Neil Wallis." Scotland Yard shilling for News Corp? I don't think people would have believed this had they seen it in a blockbuster movie.

How cozy? As The New York Times explains, the Yard hardly investigated the phone hacking scandal, ignoring mountains of evidence for years.

And then we have the social coziness:

Executives and others at the company also enjoyed close social ties to Scotland Yard's top officials. Since the hacking scandal began in 2006, Mr. Yates [the assistant commissioner] and others regularly dined with editors from News International papers, records show. Sir Paul Stephenson, the police commissioner, met for meals 18 times with company executives and editors during the investigation, including on eight occasions with Mr. Wallis while he was still working at The News of the World ...

Just after Christmas last year Sir Paul recovered from surgery at a Champneys Spa in Hertfordshire, and his $19,000 bill was paid by a friend, the spa's managing partner, Sky News reported. Sir Paul learned Saturday that Mr. Wallis had worked as a public-relations consultant for the spa ...

So I think it is quite safe to say that it is unlikely Scotland Yard pursued any serious investigation into the possibility that News Corp was involved in Climategate.

Now, it is entirely possible that News Corp wasn't involved. But there is no way of knowing until we get a thorough and independent investigation.

Here's one more astrological coincidence of the highest order: In October 2009, Wallis became a senior consultant to Outside Organisation -- a PR firm and crisis management agency, which ... wait for it ... "was used by the [University of East Anglia] following the Climategate scandal."

What's funny is that if you go over to the denier sites, like Climate Audit, the hiring of Wallis's firm by the University of East Anglia (UEA)'s Climatic Research Unit is somehow further evidence of their corruption, that they were trying to carry out "covert" operations to clear their name. One articlereports:

Wallis led on the University of East Anglia "climategate" job, when Outside was drafted in to help the university's Climatic Research Unit defend itself against charges of scientific misconduct.

In fact, most people think that UEA's crisis management was catastrophically bad for months -- "covert" is a good word for it, though I prefer "virtually nonexistent." I can't imagine wanting to put on your resume that  you were the guy in charge of UEA's PR after Climategate. It'd be like saying you advised President Bush on how to handle PR around his response to Hurricane Katrina. Of course, Wallis won't be getting many PR jobs for the foreseeable future.

Whether there is anything more than just extreme coincidence in Wallis leading on UEA's Climategate defense, I do know that when the deniers say it is cooling, you can be certain it is warming, and when they say there is no smoke, you can be sure it is a hellish, record-breaking wildfire.

In any case, it is time for an independent investigation into the Climategate email hacking. We now know that for four years, Scotland Yard sat on evidence suggesting the phones of "nearly 4,000 celebrities, politicians, sports stars, police officials and crime victims" had been hacked.

So the Climategate investigation should not involve Scotland Yard, and should investigate whether News Corp had any involvement. It could start by investigating whether News Corp hacked the phone of any climate scientists.

Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.



Murdoch blocks on Murdoch websites

from chrome
The choice to say no to Murdoch websites


https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/moepiacmhnmbiilhpojodnaopndhddpg#


What does this app do?
- Blocks websites owned and operated by News Corp

Ok cool! Which websites are blocked?
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corporation
- The default setting blocks only news and publication sites but that can be customized on the options page.

And how is a site blocked?
- When the user opens a blocked site, a warning is displayed and the user is given an option to continue to the site. 

Can the list of blocked sites be customized?
- The options page provides a full list of blocked sites which can be customized by the user. An initial list of blocked sites is set for you by default and consists of news and publication sites.

Sounds great but why should I install this app?
- Install this app to if you want to estimate News Corp's influence on your internet life, install it to make a statement to the Murdoch empire or install it because you've just had enough lies.

I'm a computer geek can I see the Source code?
-http://code.google.com/p/murdoch-block/

Are there versions for other browsers?
- Yes. Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/murdoch-block/

Any other similar apps out there?
Try Murdoch Alert for Firefox if you want to be alerted when you visit a News Corp controlled page: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/MurdochAlert-details/

Hacks hacked: Anonymous-affiliated LulzSec target The Sun in ‘Murdoch Meltdown Monday’

Hacking collective LulzSec have come out of self-imposed retirement from ‘hacktivism’ to target Rupert Murdoch’s News International.

LulzSec's hoax Murdoch death story


News International websites came under sustained attack on Monday night after ‘hacktivist’ collective Lulz Security (LulzSec) replaced The Sun ‘s website’s front page with an imitation website claiming Rupert Murdoch had died and later re-directed Sun online traffic to their own Twitter feed. The hack attack, dubbed ‘Murdoch Meltdown Monday’ by jubilant perpetrators, came out of leftfield given LulzSec recently announced their ‘retirement’ from the high-stakes hacking game.

The hoax story ‘reported’ that Murdoch has died after “having ingested a large quantity of palladium before stumbling into his famous topiary garden.”

In yet another troubling development for embattled News International, which is at the epicentre of phone hacking allegations, LulzSec claim to have accessed News International’s internal email store. Some email addresses and phone numbers for News International employees have already been released online by apparent LulzSec associates, reported The Financial Times, which noted that some are out of date.

“[T]he problems for the News International team aren’t over,” insisted The Guardian’s Chris Arthur, who speculated that “the hackers may have gained access to the email archive and be preparing to release it. If that happens, the effects could be titanic.”

In characteristically anarchist fashion, LulzSec tweeted throughout the digital assault. After the re-direct, LulzSec tweeted, “Hello, everyone that wanted to visitThe Sun! How is your day? Good? Good!’ LulzSec later tweeted, “We have joy, we have fun, we have messed up Murdoch’s Sun” and, “Arrest us. We dare you. We are the unstoppable hacking generation and you are a wasted old sack of s—, Murdoch.”

“We are the unstoppable hacking generation and you are a wasted old sack of s—, Murdoch,” tweeted LulzSec.

  • Why The Sun? The motivation behind LulzSec’s hack of The Sun “is unclear, but it is possible that the hacking gang is still angry about the newspaper’s coverage of the arrest of British teenager Ryan Cleary last month,” technology consultant Graham Cluley told Associated Press. “Cleary, who newspapers speculated was affiliated with the LulzSec hacking gang, was described by The Sun using words such as ‘geek,’ ‘nerd’ and ‘oddball’ in their report of his arrest,” reminded Cluley.

LulzSec describes itself as “a team of entertainment and security experts that specialise in the production of malicious comedic cybermaterials.”

  • How it went down. Chris Arthur at The Guardian spelled out how LulzSec ‘owned’ The Sun: “Monday night’s hack of the Sun occurred because one of the hackers found a weakness in a ‘retired’ server for the News International ‘microsites’ – used for small or unimportant stories – running Sun’s Solaris operating system. … The hacker used that and then ran a ‘local file inclusion’ program to gain access to the server – meaning they had extensive control over it. That then gave them access across large parts of the News International network, possibly including the archived emails, and to the Sun‘s ‘content management system’ (CMS) – which formats news onto pages. That will have included the code for the ‘breaking news’ element of the Sun’s main webpage; changing the entire content on the page would be too obvious. By including a line of Javascript in the ‘breaking news’ element, the hackers were able to ensure that anyone visiting the Sun‘s home page would, as the ticker was automatically refreshed, they would be redirected to anywhere that the hackers chose.”

“I know we quit, but we couldn’t sit by with our wine watching this walnut-faced Murdoch clowning around,”said a LulzSec spokesperson.

LulzSec logo

Get more on phone hacking


Rupert it is time to take time to smell the roses in Australia with your beautiful wife 

Mr Wijat explains in his new book
The Australian Media Conspiracy
Sub title: 
Mr Wijat v 

Rupert Murdoch, News Corp and others
 £100 billion damages claim in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division)

Mr Wijat said in an exclusive interview with NEWS OF THE WORLD that he does not want sue Rupert Murdoch and his News Corporation for £100 billion in damages for masterminding over the last twenty years " ...a commercial conspiracy with industrial espionage.. police corruption at the highest level ... legal, police, business and other intimidation.."... to make sure Mr Wijat does not have the backing and resources to launch his Australian Weekend News Newspaper Masthead in competition against News Corporation's stranglehold of the Australian print media through News Corporation's 70% ownership and control print media in Australia which makes News Corp over £100 billion a year in profits which all get sent out of Australia to the USA to help finance News Corp's development of the USA Media. It has been News Corp's over massive profits from its Australian newspapers ( over 150) that has been the cash cow to expand News Corp into the massive global media organisation it is today with a turnover of around $32 billion and a net profit of around $2.5 billion.
Every time Mr Wijat tried to launch is a serious way his Australian Weekend News newspaper Australia wide since the 1990's, Rupert Murdoch, James Murdoch and their all powerful multi billion dollar global media empire run under their flagship News Corporation and their control of the media, journalists, editors, police, business, government, politicians, courts, the legal fraternity, security firms, real estate agents, valuers, banks, finance industry, private investigators and the general public who believe what is written in the Murdoch/News Corp publication in Australia have been their to tap phones, emails, create fear and distrust, create financial problems, steal computer software, threaten with their unlimited resources to destroy through the court system, have banks cancel approved loans, make sure banks and other financiers do not approve loans, destroy financial assets, have financial supports falsely arrest on false charges... anything to make sure Mr Wijat is not able to launch in a serious way his Australian Weekend News newspaper masthead to take on Rupert and James Murdoch complete stranglehold on the Australia Print media which make over $100 million a year profit for their News Corporation. 
Mr Wijat has tried ringing Rupert to discuss an amicable solution and has left countless messages for Rupert to ring or email Mr Wijat...but no response whatsoever...so Mr Wijat says he is forced to issue a High Court Action for £100 billion in damages next week if he does not hear from Rupert.
Mr Wijat can be contacted at
mrwijat@NOTW.bz
or
mrwijat@gmail.com

Mr Wijat says ...".. Jullia Gillard,  the Prime Minster of Australia, is right when she says that a police, judicial and political inquiries should be started to look at the way Rupert and James Murdoch and their News Corporation have gained control of 70% of the print media in Australia and how they use that control.."




Video of Julia Gillard Speaking out on the Murdochs and News Corporations' 
 Influence in the media in Australia


Click here for more  Images for julia gillard
Julia Gillard - 

Julia Eileen Gillard (/ˈɡɪlɑrd/,born 29 September 1961) is the 27th and current Prime Minister of Australia, in office since June 2010.

Gillard was elected at the 1998 federal election to the House of Representatives seat of Lalor, Victoria for the Australian Labor Party. Following the 2001 federal election, Gillard was elected to the shadow cabinet with the portfolios of Population and Immigration. The Reconciliation and Indigenous Affairs and the Health portfolios were added in 2003. In December 2006, Kevin Ruddwas elected Labor leader and Leader of the Opposition, with Gillard as deputy leader.

Gillard became the Deputy Prime Minister upon Labor's victory in the 2007 federal election, also serving as Minister for Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. On 24 June 2010, after Rudd lost the support of his party and stood aside, Gillard became federal leader of the Australian Labor Party and thus the Prime Minister, the first female holder of the office.

The 2010 federal election saw the incumbent Gillard Labor government elected to a second term over the Coalition opposition, led by Tony Abbott, and formed a minority government with support of an Australian Greens MP and three independent MPs.


News Corp Shareholders and the rest of the world investment community think it is time for Rupert Murdoch to retire in Australia on a very private beach side acreage property the Murdochs have their eyes on...


NEWS OF THE WORLD's exclusive secret video of
 Deep Underground Military Bases (DUMB) in the United States of America..
which are only available for the rich and powerful, corporate business and political elite.. when thongs get tough on plant earth... 
for the rest of Americans it is FEMA CAMPS for them.... 

They did not want the masses to see this video...
The masses are not meant to know about D U M B's in the USA 
and all over the world at secret locations that have been built...


Wife of Rupert Murdoch defends her man from Pie Thrower








Pressure grows on News Corp to strip Murdoch of chairman's role

By Stephen Foley in New York 21st July 2011


Religious groups on both sides of the Atlantic are putting pressure on News Corp to make big governance changes to improve ethics at the tainted company, including stripping Rupert Murdoch of his role as chairman.

In the UK, the Church of England is demanding a new ethics policy to ensure that the "reprehensible" conduct by some News of the World journalists cannot happen again, while in the US, an investment manager for Catholic groups plans to assail Mr Murdoch at the next News Corp shareholder meeting with a vote on splitting the roles of chairman and chief executive.

Their efforts come at a vulnerable moment for Mr Murdoch and his grip over the company he built into one of the world's largest media empires, as even large mainstream shareholders are calling for corporate governance changes. The company's independent non-executive directors have retained an outside law firm to advise them on their responsibilities in dealing with the hacking scandal and its aftermath, a move which campaigners believe could set in train significant changes.

The non-executives are believed to be considering elevating Chase Carey, the respected chief operating officer, to the post of chief executive, leaving Mr Murdoch as executive chairman.

But Christian Brothers Investment Services, which manages $4bn for 1,000 Catholic institutions worldwide, has demanded News Corp allow a "floor resolution" at the next shareholder meeting in October to vote on stripping Mr Murdoch of the chairmanship of the board.

"So many concerns have come to light because of the hacking scandal," the organisation's assistant director of socially responsible investing, Julie Tanner, told The Independent. "It is costing investors a lot in terms of jobs, the reputation of the company, its market position and billions of dollars in enterprise value. There is a lack of oversight at the company and obviously immediate corporate governance changes are needed to restore public trust."

The introduction of an independent non-executive chairman over Mr Murdoch's head would reflect best practice in corporate governance and bring in "an extra layer of checks and balances" to rectify oversight failures that have gone right to the top, Ms Tanner said.

In the UK, the Church of England has increased its pressure on News Corp. It has £3.8m invested in the US-listed company, and has threatened to sell the stake. The chairman of its Ethical Investment Advisory Group, wrote to the company two weeks ago and the church said yesterday: "Although recent developments at News Corp have started to address some of the issues, the EIAG continues to have serious concerns. Clearly the company has a great deal to do, over time, to demonstrate that it has learned and acted upon the lessons of this scandal."

News Corp shares rose again yesterday, after the rating agency Fitch said it saw no reason to downgrade the group's bonds. "Currently, there is no evidence to indicate that the activities... at News of the World have occurred at News Corp's other businesses," it said. "Fitch does not see risk to the company's brand that would result in large, protracted advertising losses."

The directors with Murdoch's fate in their hands...

Jose Maria Aznar

Nothing demonstrated Rupert Murdoch's proximity to political power more clearly than his ability to lure the former conservative Spanish prime minister to sit on his corporate board in 2006.

Peter Barnes

The Australian executive spent much of his career in the wine and tobacco industry at Philip Morris, and retired to spend more time with his vineyard and non-executive directorships such as chairing the glove and condom firm Ansell.

Natalie Bancroft

The 31-year-old opera singer and journalism graduate was the one representative of the Bancroft family invited to join the News Corp board when it bought the clan's newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, in 2007.

Kenneth Cowley

As a former executive running a major subsidiary of News Corp until 1997, and since he has also been onthe board for 32 years, Mr Cowley would not be considered an independent director under UK rules.

Viet Dinh

The man who wrote much of the Patriot Act for the Bush administration after the 9/11 terrorist attacks has become the non-executive point-man for News Corp's internal investigation into hacking.

Sir Roderick Eddington

Knighted for "services to civil aviation", theformer Australian chief executive of British Airways is News Corp's most senior independent director and would lead any revolt against Mr Murdoch.

Andrew Knight

After being chairman of News Corp's UK newspapers arm, News International, in the Nineties, the former journalist has spent the last decade in non-executive roles in the finance industry.

John Thornton

The former co-chief operating officer of Goldman Sachs now sits on the boards of some of the world's most powerful companies, including the banking giant HSBC in the UK, and the car maker Ford in the US.

Thomas Perkins

The 79-year-old veteran of Silicon Valley's venture capital industry came strongly out in favour of Mr Murdoch continuing in his current roles. The octogenarian is a "genius", Mr Perkins said.

http://79.125.111.126/focus/mwidget?lpage&rid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fbusiness%2Fcomment%2Fdavid-prosser-investors-look-forw



Julie Burchill: The day Rebekah's fortune was told

In the Eighties when I was young and Godless, I penned a frankly filthy, and filthily frank, book called Ambition which went to the top of the paperback novel charts and made me a packet. It concerned the antics of one Susan Street, a young woman who was "almost clever and almost beautiful" and was determined to become the most powerful broad in Fleet Street. In the course of fulfilling this desire, Susan was not only prepared to sell her soul, but to slip it a Rophynol and bend it over the nearest sideboard in order to have it taken roughly from behind by any passing potentate, should this help her advance up the greasy pole.

Once again, surveying the shambles at News International, I have wondered at my ability to get it wrong. My heroine oohed, ahhed and orgied through a series of increasingly lurid encounters with Brazilian hookers, New York lesbian sadists and even, if I remember rightly, a demonically-possessed, sexually-obsessed electric toothbrush in order to win the top job from her ancient and corrupt boss, one Tobias Pope. But it has been a striking feature of the current revelations, however murky, that no "three-in-a-bed hells" or even "naked romping" took place between the flame-haired counter-jumper and her powerful patron. On the contrary, both appear to be the very model of devoted partners to their respective spouses. Spoilsports!


Julie Burchill: The day Rebekah's fortune was told

21st July 2011

In the Eighties when I was young and Godless, I penned a frankly filthy, and filthily frank, book called Ambition which went to the top of the paperback novel charts and made me a packet. It concerned the antics of one Susan Street, a young woman who was "almost clever and almost beautiful" and was determined to become the most powerful broad in Fleet Street. In the course of fulfilling this desire, Susan was not only prepared to sell her soul, but to slip it a Rophynol and bend it over the nearest sideboard in order to have it taken roughly from behind by any passing potentate, should this help her advance up the greasy pole.

Once again, surveying the shambles at News International, I have wondered at my ability to get it wrong. My heroine oohed, ahhed and orgied through a series of increasingly lurid encounters with Brazilian hookers, New York lesbian sadists and even, if I remember rightly, a demonically-possessed, sexually-obsessed electric toothbrush in order to win the top job from her ancient and corrupt boss, one Tobias Pope. But it has been a striking feature of the current revelations, however murky, that no "three-in-a-bed hells" or even "naked romping" took place between the flame-haired counter-jumper and her powerful patron. On the contrary, both appear to be the very model of devoted partners to their respective spouses. Spoilsports!

Mention of the Chipping Norton Set seemed promising at first – "sets" are usually "fast", and sound a great deal like "sex" anyway. Mrs Brooks husband was an old Etonian racehorse trainer, nicknamed both "Looks" and "Champagne Charlie", who appeared to have squired a number of glamorous exes of famous men, from princes to sporting heroes – so far, so Jilly Cooper. But once membership was known to have included the ickily-uxorious David Cameron and that ocean-going anaphrodisiac Jeremy Clarkson, all bets were off.

Murdoch's happy possession of a sexy Chinese wife caused the heart to yearn hopefully for some sort of shenanigans, but the chances she might be a heartless, inscrutable minx were scuppered by her rather lovely though dismayingly loyal defence of her old man from the joker with the shaving foam. Murdoch has a son who seeks to walk in his giant footsteps, as did my monstrous Pope, but whereas Pope Jnr is a sexy Jewish swashbuckler with genitalia resembling "a cosh wrapped in velvet", Murdoch Jnr looks more like a gutless Gissing bit-player caught with his hand in the petty cash.

And as far as Rebekah herself, she is far cuter, cleverer and more fascinating than my really rather repulsive heroine. We were briefly friends in the Nineties and my fondest memory is of the day she visited me in Brighton, when after a lush lunch we and her friend Jane Moore decided to visit a fortune-teller. When we got there I bottled out on religious grounds, but Bex marched in – and ten minutes later out again, her face almost as red as her lovely hair. The fortune-teller had only gone and told her that although she thought she was a career girl, she had a rich and successful man who worshipped her (she was married to Ross Kemp at the time) and that was where her best bet lay.

Jane and I fell about with laughter at this as Rebekah fumed, though we couldn't decide whether or not he actually knew who she was. But the gypsy's warning came too late for my quiet, kind friend, while I escaped to the coast, out of harm's way, wondering at how things turn out. Stranger than fiction – too true.

Cheap gin and sex would be better for us than water

"Calm down, dear." It wasn't long ago that Ravey Davey got into shtup with the sisters for saying that, but when you consider the "pampering" culture which women have embraced freely over the past decade, you could see why he was confused about the subsequent scoldings. Isn't the whole spa culture about persistently telling ourselves to calm down, while paying handsomely for the privilege?

The girly spa stay has replaced the dirty weekend as the dream mini-break of many women. In oversize white towelling gowns, clutching bottles of water as though they were tiny, transparent life-support machines, we prowled the hushed, lemongrass-scented hotels of this far from fragrant land like smelly ghosts for many a restless year, paying through the nose for unguents that actually have no way of seeping through the skin and blowing our hard-earned cash on scented candles while Rome – and Greece, and Ireland – burned.

But now that mainlining bottled water and green tea 24/7 have been proven to be useless and £10 face creams regularly outperform £100 pots, we will hopefully start finding more sensible, fun and proven ways to calm ourselves down/comfort ourselves in these cash-strapped times, such as drinking cheap gin and having lots of sex. It worked for generations of British women, and there's no reason why it couldn't work for us.

Easy to be nice if you've enjoyed privilege

I was sorry to see the back of The Apprentice, and even sorrier to see Nice Tom win. People can afford to be nice when they're privileged. The back stories of the female finalists, on the other hand spoke of real deprivation, yet they were ceaselessly mocked for being so full-on ambitious. But when your mother doesn't speak English and you grew up without a bathroom (as Susan did) or you took an after-school job so that you could pay for your own school dinners rather than accept free ones (as Natasha did), ambition is often the only thing that prevents you from giving up and going under.

I find it endlessly fascinating, and not a little pitiable, that educated liberals cannot find even a little understanding for the poor of their own country, while practically wetting themselves with compassion when it comes to foreign aid. For these right-on Smuggies, charity may not begin at home, but contempt certainly does.

Like Julie Burchill on The Independent on Facebook for updates




The Sketch: Prime Minister has gone from Flashman to earnest penitent

Simon Carr 21st July 2011

Recalling Parliament was a bold, unusual, exciting thing to do. If only we hadn't had to turn up it would have been perfect.

Our holidays were delayed by a double dose of phone hacking – an endless statement was followed by an endless debate (which may still be going on when we get back in September)

The questions and answers have been honed to perfection but occasionally new charges arise. Tom Watson said he sent a letter to Cameron last year with specific information about hacking; Nick Raynsford made dark reference to the Cabinet Secretary being alerted last year to the hacking of a senior figure in the government service; and time and again, Cameron refused to name the company that vetted Coulson.

For his part, the Prime Minister told us that Alastair Campbell falsified documents when he was in government. And when in need of a cheer he mentioned the "despicable behaviour" of some of Labour's communications crew in recent times.

"There is only one party leader with a News International executive sitting in his office with a cloud over his head," he said.

"No more cheap partisanship," Louise Mensch demanded and then went immediately on to name Tom Baldwin and Damien McBride.

Ed Miliband occasionally tried a cross-party tone. "The reason we didn't speak out was because News International was too powerful." More precisely, they didn't speak out because they were afraid of offending a News International executive at a party.

Nonetheless, Ed Miliband had a good day. He was challenged again about Baldwin and the allegations of blagging bank accounts under Lord Ashcroft's control. EDM said he had believed the assurances given by The Times about Baldwin's good character because they were issued by his line manager – Michael Gove, now the Secretary for Education. That carefully worded remark got a good laugh.

Whether the modest increase in popularity takes Miliband beyond his net negative rating of -16 remains to be seen. There are presentational issues outstanding.

The face is still producing the output of three or four ordinary faces; spasms of excitement can make it turn inside out. He leans forward on the bench pushing annoying expressions into the chamber, very like the clever boy in the class who needs a bit more bullying to make a man of him.

But we can't look to the Prime Minister for that. The Flashman approach has failed. Cameron is now an earnest penitent, forced to penance by the pieties of his young opponents. In life as in art. Remember, in the book, Flashman was actually bested by his two young victims in a climactic fight.

Like Simon Carr on The Independent on Facebook for updates

Deng is a role model to young Chinese girls, who see her rise as inspirational

REX FEATURES

Deng is a role model to young Chinese girls, who see her rise as inspirational

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/wendi-deng-the-real-power-behind-the-throne-2317692.html

Wendi Deng: The real power behind the throne

Wendi Deng has become an unlikely star of the hacking scandal, thanks to her feisty defence of Rupert Murdoch. Susannah Frankel discovers the truth about the 'tiger wife'

What did Wendi Deng first see in the billionaire Rupert Murdoch? It's the oldest joke in the book and one that has long been directed at this relationship – by everyone from supposedly hostile Murdoch family members, who have expressed their disdain since the media mogul tied the knot with her on his yacht, Morning Glory, in 1999, to the media and the world at large.

But if octogenarian Murdoch's fumbling – and even at times confused – performance at the House of Commons on Tuesday was surprising, it paled into insignificance, in terms of theatrics at least, of his third wife. The impeccably groomed and until that point inscrutable Deng leapt to his defence, unceremoniously slapping the improbably named "pie man", Jonnie Marbles, and thereby deflecting his assault long before anyone as effective as a security guard, say, had the good sense to intervene.

Deng, in a reassuringly expensive rose-pink jacket, cornflower blue shirt and black skirt, and with long, dark hair, sat behind her husband on doubtless the most difficult day of his long career. Her dignity and self-discipline were palpable – particularly as compared with the ruffled and defensive behaviour of the two other women in his life: daughter Elisabeth and erstwhile chief executive Rebekah Brooks.

Wendi gently discouraged Mr Murdoch from banging the desk in front of him – image control doesn't come much more finely tuned than this – smiled at him, and rubbed his back when the going got particularly tough. It looked like genuine affection – and it probably was.

Those far less likely to sympathise with Murdoch's predicament have since admitted to feeling compassion for him, after all – although admittedly of the kind more usually directed towards a marginally dotty, errant old uncle as opposed to an equal or spouse.

Whatever, every detail of her behaviour and physical appearance was immaculately well-mannered – note the Chanel Particulière nail polish, a well-chosen and suitably understated touch when, as it soon turned out, she might be more suited to Vamp.

It was all just as one might expect from the wife of one of the world's most powerful men. Her reaction to a threat to his personal safety was clearly instinctive, however, and in no way planned. And what instincts. "At last the News of the World enquiry has exposed News Corps deepest darkest secret," wrote the journalist Joe Hildebrand on Twitter. "Wendi Deng is a Power Ranger."

So a new media heroine (or should that be superhero?) is born, and one who is a more formidable prospect than either Kate Middleton or Victoria Beckham, to name perhaps the two most conspicuous examples beloved by this country's press – not least for their predominantly passive behaviour and for being shrinking violets by comparison with Mrs Murdoch.

Although increasingly well known in the US, Deng's profile here has been relatively low until now – her husband Rupert appeared to prefer it that way, in the early days of their marriage especially. Interviews with her are still unheard of. When The Wall Street Journal (not then Murdoch-owned) ran a lead feature in the year 2000 on his new wife's quiet but significant influence, he was reportedly not amused, and she subsequently refused to speak to the journalists who penned it. "As the wife of the chairman and a private citizen, Wendi is entitled to her privacy," the then News Corp spokesperson, Gary Ginsberg, said, words that are nothing if not ironic as it turns out.

In 1999, Murdoch told Vanity Fair magazine that his relationship with his wife ruled out her working for News Corp at that point. Instead, she was "busy working on decorating the new apartment" in Manhattan, social X-ray style. Later, it is thought that he pulled a profile of her written by a contributor to Fortune magazine and destined for an Australian newspaper chain he partly owned at the time.

The truth will invariably out, however, as Mr Murdoch has learnt elsewhere to his immense cost. More recently, his wife's reputation as a behind-the-scenes trouser-wearer par excellence, both personally and professionally, precedes her. In Michael Wolff's biography of Murdoch, he writes of Deng: "Let's recast this story as a triumphal, even uplifting tale of pluck and achievement. She's not [William Makepeace Thackeray's cynical social-climbing heroine] Becky Sharp, she's Pip in Great Expectations." Certainly, the lady has done spectacularly well for herself. In her home country she is, by all accounts, something of a role model to thousands of young Chinese women, many of whom see her rise to wealth and Western supremacy as nothing short of inspirational as, on at least some levels, indeed they might.

She was born Deng Wen Ge – one of three children and the daughter of a factory manager – and grew up in eastern China, simplifying her name to Wendi in her mid-teens.

While studying medicine, aged 16, she met the Californian couple, Jake and Joyce Cherry, who had been posted to the region. They would turn out to be her ticket to the West. Proving herself a tough cookie from the start, Deng persuaded the Cherrys to sponsor her for a student visa to the US.

Mrs Cherry's help and affection was rewarded by her young protégé promptly running off with her husband – 30 years her senior. They married but lived together for no more than a few months. It wasn't long before Deng was embroiled in an affair with David Wolf, a man of her own age, and a little less than three years later, she and Jake Cherry divorced. Mr Cherry told The Wall Street Journal: "She told me I was a father concept to her, but it would never be anything else. I loved that girl."

With an MBA from Yale University and a degree in economics, Deng was then employed by Star TV, News Corp's Asian satellite-television operation in Hong Kong, as an intern in 1996. She met Murdoch in 1998 when she was assigned the job of his interpreter in Shanghai and Beijing – rumours of a blossoming relationship of a more intimate nature between them began circulating a matter of months after that.

It is unsurprising that Deng, 42, has attracted the requisite jibes reserved for much younger wives. When Anna Nicole Smith died, Private Eye published a picture of her as a dominatrix captioned with the words: "Anna Nicole Deng: the scheming temptress who stole her way into the heart of a foolish old man – and stole all his money as well".

On the other hand – and equally the stuff of cliché – Murdoch has been accused of being attracted to her more for her abilities to ease his entry into China than anything as straightforward as, for example, youth or beauty. She is fluent in Mandarin in an age where expansion into that continent is the economic Holy Grail – and as well as acting as a quasi-ambassador for News Corp there, she has been chief strategist for MySpace China.

She is also co-founder and co-CEO of the film company Big Feet productions – Snow Flower and the Secret Fan happens to be its current project, and will have a giant publicity boost after this week. In short, she's anything but a trophy wife.

Privately, Deng has proved a softening influence on Murdoch who, thanks to his wife, is prepared to go to work dressed in chinos and black turtleneck where previously only a suit or tie would do. He's also sporting more modish heavy-framed glasses these days. The aforementioned Manhattan home, meanwhile, was reportedly designed according to the diktats of feng shui, which it is difficult to imagine Murdoch actively embracing without his wife's input.

Wendi Deng is now the mother of Grace and Chloe, two potential heiresses of Murdoch's. Although his children from former marriages – Prudence, Lachlan, Elisabeth and James – and his second wife, Anna, fought his attempts to give his youngest progeny a say in the running of his empire, the young children will benefit from his fortune nonetheless. In 2007, both Grace and Chloe received $100m (£62m) in stock from their father.

So what next for Wendi Deng? If past form is anything to go by, she will continue to stand by her man while the rest of the world decries him and, for that, she may prove to be his finest asset.

Straight after the pie-throwing incident, social-media sites were lit up with praise for Deng – some ironic, but much of it genuine admiration. "Wendi heroic protector of fading old genius," tweeted Channel 4 News' Jon Snow not long after her by-now legendary intervention.

So during a scandal that continues to erupt around the name Murdoch, this relatively unknown character has, in a matter of seconds, lent a tender aspect to the story. Even the most adept of publicists (or damage-limitation experts) would have been considered foolhardy ever even to have dreamt of that.

1Wendi Deng: The real power behind the throne

2Hacking was endemic at the 'Mirror', says former reporter

3The fearless, shameless reporter at centre of storm

4Ten adverts that shocked the world

5Anna Murdoch Mann: 'He was hard, ruthless and determined'

6Robert Fisk: Why I had to leave The Times

7FBI to contact Jude Law as inquiries widen in US

8Murdoch unmasked: Meeting a media mogul

9Stephen Glover: The BBC has conspired with The Guardian to heat up an old story and attack Murdoch

10Hacking In Brief: 23/07/2011

11Hello, partner: Sugar ups ante in 'Apprentice'

12Red-top redemption: Why tabloid journalism matters

13Show's over for the man who saved Radio 1 from 'Smashie and Nicey'

14Behind Rupert's throne: The story of Rebekah Brooks

15Australia watchdog frowns on Murdoch bid


Andreas Whittam Smith: Murdoch's unique way of doing business won't change

The 'don't ask, don't tell' culture permeates his operations. When things get tougher, the Murdoch technique is to try denial, or throw the police off the scent

21st July 2011

The question I ask about people who have built up huge businesses by their own efforts is, what is their special, precocious gift. What does this particular tycoon have that others don't possess? What is Rupert Murdoch's key attribute? In the case, for instance, of Robert Maxwell who came to own the Daily Mirror, it was his immensely superior bargaining talents, first learnt as a pedlar in eastern Europe before the war. Sir James (Jimmy) Goldsmith, to take another example, described by this newspaper in its obituary as "one of the most buccaneering and charismatic figures of the last 40 years", was also a financial engineer of genius.

Rupert Murdoch is different again. As an owner of media businesses around the world, he understands better than anyone what it takes to avoid or soften media regulation by governments so as to create dominant positions in individual markets. Does American law say that only US citizens are allowed to own TV stations? Right, this proud Australian will become a naturalised US citizen, as he did in 1985, a year before he founded Fox Broadcasting. In Britain he has displayed this talent to the full. His masterstroke was getting Mrs Thatcher's government to wave through his purchase of The Times and The Sunday Times in 1981 without referring it to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission even though, when added to the Sun and the News of the World, it took his share of the national newspaper market close to 40 per cent.

To defend this semi-monopoly and to create others in the UK, such as pay TV (BSkyB), Mr Murdoch has gradually developed a number of powerful techniques. The most important is to take advantage of politicians' obsession with the next general election. For that nagging worry leads them to dread having a bad relationship. So call regularly at No 10 Downing Street – coming in through the back door if necessary. Prime ministers are Mr Murdoch's main targets because they have at once both the most acute fear of losing power and the greatest ability to deflect unwelcome media regulation. The frequency of these visits has been known for some time but many other things we didn't understand have become clear in the past few weeks.

It wasn't as clear as it is now, that the Murdoch technique involves buttressing this access by getting your family and your senior executives to develop parallel relationships with the prime ministers of the day and their entourages and senior ministers. This activity got going at full pelt straight after Mr Cameron entered Downing Street. So Rebekah Brooks gets herself invited to Mr Cameron's 44th birthday party at Chequers. James Murdoch and his wife went to stay there shortly afterwards. The Brooks's and the Camerons saw a lot of each other over Christmas. Of course not a word was said about media regulation on these jolly occasions, but on one side at least, it is bound to have been the unspoken agenda. It looks as if Scotland Yard got the message, too. If these people are personal friends of the Prime Minister, go easy in any investigations into their potentially criminal activities. So, with silken threads, the Murdochs bind up the Prime Minister.

It has also become apparent that another Murdoch ploy is to get his people appointed to important posts in the heart of organisations he seeks to influence. Funnily enough the Metropolitan Police provides just as good examples of this as Downing Street's employment of the former News of the World editor as Communications Director. So Neil Wallis, Mr Coulson's former deputy editor, gets taken on by the Metropolitan Police as a senior PR adviser and another News of the World journalist is employed as a translator – who, incidentally, is thus able to listen in to the early stages of criminal cases long before they become public. Finally – a nice one, this – place numerous former Murdoch journalists in staff jobs in the police press office.

The Murdoch empire, however, requires defensive techniques as well as methods of attack. What about MPs who won't bend the knee? What is to be done about them? Fortunately from Mr Murdoch's point of view, his tabloid newspapers have already found the answer. Use the same investigative techniques into their private lives, right up to and including telephone hacking, blagging personal details from banks and so on, that are already employed by News of the World journalists to expose minor celebrities. Gordon Brown described some of these. Information was obtained from the former prime minister's bank account and legal file .

What to do, though, if these useful weapons are to be seized from your hands as a result of court actions by injured parties? First you can fall back on the "don't ask, don't tell" culture that permeates Mr Murdoch's operations. That was seen on full display when Rupert and James Murdoch appeared in front of the Parliamentary committee on Tuesday. Murdoch senior said he had no idea what had been going on – although he also admitted that he was quite prepared to ring up the editor of The Sunday Times every Saturday evening to find out what was in the paper. The difference is that the latter knowledge couldn't compromise him whereas precise details of how subordinates operated could well do so.

When things get still tougher, the Murdoch technique is to try denial. Say that phone hacking was confined to one rogue reporter and his assistant. And keep on saying it. But as the Culture Select Committee of Parliament commented in February 2010: "it is inconceivable that senior management at the paper were unaware of widespread hacking". Or, if this doesn't work, you can try to throw the police off the scent. Assistant Commissioner John Yates said on Tuesday: "News International... clearly misled us." Or you can refuse to co-operate with the police.

Yesterday's report by the Home Affairs Committee stated that the police told us that "they were unable to pursue the inquiry further with News International because of their refusal to co-operate". Now we are told that total commitment to find the truth is the order of the day. That is highly unlikely. Over half a century Mr Murdoch has refined a method of operating that cannot suddenly be thrown off like a winter coat. The Murdochs will go on being the Murdochs.

Like Andreas Whittam Smith on The Independent on Facebook for updates

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/law-firm-given-right-of-reply-over-failure-to-expose-bribery-2317840.html

Law firm given right of reply over 'failure' to expose bribery

By Ian Burrell and Oliver Wright 21st July 2011 

A law firm blamed by Rupert Murdoch for failing to raise the alarm over evidence of police bribes at News International was last night given the go-ahead to put its side of events to police and MPs.

Harbottle & Lewis, who also represent the Queen, was said to be furious at the allegations of wrongdoing made against it by the Murdochs but unable to explain why it did not hand over files to the police due to client-lawyer confidentiality.

News Corp's management and standards committee announced after 7pm yesterday, on a day when Parliament went into recess, that its British arm, News International, had given the law firm permission to answer questions from Scotland Yard and parliamentary committees.

Jemima Khan arrives at Portcullis House to hear the Murdochs give evidence on Tuesday

PA

Jemima Khan arrives at Portcullis House to hear the Murdochs give evidence on Tuesday

A law firm blamed by Rupert Murdoch for failing to raise the alarm over evidence of police bribes at News International was last night given the go-ahead to put its side of events to police and MPs.

Harbottle & Lewis, who also represent the Queen, was said to be furious at the allegations of wrongdoing made against it by the Murdochs but unable to explain why it did not hand over files to the police due to client-lawyer confidentiality.

News Corp's management and standards committee announced after 7pm yesterday, on a day when Parliament went into recess, that its British arm, News International, had given the law firm permission to answer questions from Scotland Yard and parliamentary committees.

"News International has today authorised the law firm Harbottle & Lewis to answer questions from the Metropolitan Police Service and parliamentary select committees in respect of what they were asked to do." Earlier in the day Harbottle had said News International's refusal to release it from professional duties of confidentiality effectively prevented it from responding to "any inaccurate statements or contentions".

News International also announced it had halted the payment of legal fees to the disgraced private investigator Glenn Mulcaire. It is believed to have been paying the fees since he was first arrested in 2006.

Further light on why News International failed to produce evidence of the extent of hacking is expected to be provided by the company's former director of legal affairs, Jon Chapman, who was accused by News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch of sitting on a report into hacking prepared by Harbottle & Lewis. Addressing MPs on Tuesday, he said: "Mr Chapman, who was in charge of this, has left us. He had that report for a number of years." Mr Chapman, who left NI this month, is said to be preparing a letter answering the allegations for the Commons committee on Culture, Media and Sport.

The publicist Max Clifford revealed he has been talking to the police for several months in relation to its Operation Weeting inquiry into hacking and that he would be happy to co-operate with the Serious Fraud Office if it opens an investigation into News International.

Richard Alderman, the director of the SFO, is considering whether there are grounds for an investigation into potential breaches of company law by the media firm after it admitted making payments to Mr Clifford and Gordon Taylor, the chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association. "The payment of large sums in order to prevent details of criminal activity by employees becoming public is a gross misuse of shareholders' money," wrote Tom Watson, the Labour MP, to Mr Alderman, alleging that the payments had been made in order to suppress further investigation of the scale of phone-hacking.

Mr Clifford described his payment as "very simple". He said: "When I found out what happened to me, I got all the information and eventually they caved in and apologised." The £1m settlement was negotiated "over lunch" with News International's chief executive, Rebekah Brooks, who resigned last week. "That fee was based on what I would have made from them in the four years I was not dealing with them," Mr Clifford said.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-ordered-to-release-files-to-jemima-khan-and-hugh-grant-2317868.html

Police ordered to release files to Jemima Khan and Hugh Grant

By Jerome Taylor 21st July 2011

Newspapers other than the News of the World may have been involved in hacking the phones of Hugh Grant and Jemima Khan, the High Court heard yesterday.

Lawyers for the two celebrities went to court to force the Metropolitan Police to release any documents that might contain evidence that the private investigator Glenn Mulcaire was intercepting their voicemails while he was working for News International.

Ordering the police to release the files, Mr Justice Vos said Mr Grant and Ms Khan were entitled to see any documentation that might have been intercepted by the private investigator and consequently used for articles in "the News of the World and other newspapers".

The judge also ordered the disclosure of former NOTW reporter Clive Goodman's notes used in his work as royal editor and gossip columnist.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/george-osborne-went-over-leaders-heads-to-register-his-approval-2317835.html

George Osborne went over leaders' heads to register his approval

By Oliver Wright, Whitehall Editor 21st July 2011

George Osborne suggested hiring Andy Coulson at a private dinner with David Cameron over the head of the then chairman of the Conservative Party.

The wooing of Mr Coulson in 2007, when he had resigned as editor of the News of the World following the jailing of the royal editor Clive Goodman and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire for phone hacking, was also taken without the knowledge of the Conservatives' head of campaigning at the time, George Bridges.

Yesterday in the House of Commons, Mr Cameron tacitly admitted the role of Mr Osborne in hiring Mr Coulson, who was arrested two weeks ago on suspicion of bribing police officers and of phone hacking.

Mr Cameron was allegedly warned by The Guardian and by other politicians about hiring Mr Coulson in view of the questions about his editorship of the tabloid.

Asked whether Mr Osborne had been behind the idea to approach Mr Coulson to offer him the job of director of communications for the Tories – and later for the Government – Mr Cameron replied: "The Chancellor has many bright ideas but in the end this was my decision."

Initial discussions with Mr Coulson are believed to have taken place with Mr Osborne and Steve Hilton, Mr Cameron's chief strategist, who also moved to Downing Street with the Prime Minister.

Francis Maude, who was the Conservative Party chairman at the time, was only informed of the discussions after Mr Coulson's appointment had been approved in principle by the leader.

Mr Maude negotiated Mr Coulson's £275,000 salary.

Mr Bridges was told the identity of the party's new director of communications and planning once the appointment had been made.

He is understood to have protested about Mr Coulson's arrival. Yesterday Mr Bridges, who now works for a public affairs consultancy, was unavailable for comment.

On Wednesday, Rebekah Brooks dismissed suggestions that she had advised Mr Cameron to make Mr Coulson his director of communications after he left the NOTW in 2007.

"I think it is a matter of public knowledge that it was George Osborne, the Chancellor's idea that when Andy Coulson left the News of the World they should start discussions with him on whether he [should] be the appropriate person to go into Tory headquarters," Ms Brooks told a Commons Select Committee.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/missing-notw-executive-tracked-down-in-florida-2317837.html

Greg Miskiw, 61, (real name Ihor) 

who has been named in connection to phone-hacking damages claims and was last known to be living in a luxury flat in central Manchester, has been tracked down to a rented property a short walk from the beach in a trendy corner of the resort. His former partner was last month arrested in Leeds by officers from Operation


Greg Miskiw, 61, (real name Ihor) Photo1 below, Photo2 below House in Florida where Greg Miskiw lives and where UK Polivr found Greg Miskiw.


Elisebeth Murdoch the daughter of Rupert Murdoch

Andy Coulson sneaking out the back door of number 10 Downing Street London to try and avoid news reporters and camera men after being accused of an involvement with authorising phone hacking - police bribes and blinging at the old News of the World when run by News International a subsidiary of Rupert Murdochs multi billion Media Empire News Corp.

Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal with Rupert Murduch who played a key role in Rebekah Brooks' departure from News International has voiced his full support for Rupert and James Murdoch.

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal issued a statement to say he remained confident that News Corp will continue to be a valuable long-term investment.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/key-news-corp-shareholder-backs-murdoch-2317929.html

Missing NOTW executive tracked down in Florida

By Cahal Milmo and Martin Hickman 21st July 2011

A former News of the World assistant editor near the top of a list of people that detectives from the hacking inquiry want to speak to has been found living off the fig tree-lined avenues of Palm Beach, Florida.

Greg Miskiw, 61, (real name Ihor) who has been named in connection to phone-hacking damages claims and was last known to be living in a luxury flat in central Manchester, has been tracked down to a rented property a short walk from the beach in a trendy corner of the resort. His former partner was last month arrested in Leeds by officers from Operation.

While his one-time colleagues, including the former NOTW editor Andy Coulson and assistant editor Ian Edmondson, have been answering the questions of detectives in London police stations about alleged conspiracy to intercept voicemails, Mr Miskiw seems to have been planning for a future in the Sunshine State, 4,000 miles away.

The Palm Beach Post found that the former executive has an apartment in a terracotta-roofed building close to the sandy shores of the Florida coast. It reported that Mr Miskiw had worked for two months this year for the publisher of the National Enquirer, a salacious gossip sheet in the US, and last month registered a company, News Team LLC.

The parking spot for the flat is occupied by an orange Saab 9-3 convertible. Sources pointed out that Mr Miskiw, who left the now-defunct NOTW in 2005, was a newsdesk executive during the time that phone hacking is alleged to have been conducted on behalf of the title.


andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Politicians hit back at newspapers

I have been surprised by the thirst for revenge displayed by politicians.

howard_jacobson

Howard Jacobson: Brought low by those who think ill of us

Since when was sexual circumspection proof of a generous or capacious mind?

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Practical approach to marriage

Anyone who's had a go at internet dating will tell you it's all about a shopping list.




'Murky practices' revealed, says Nick Clegg

PA 21st July 2011

The phone-hacking scandal has uncovered "murky practices and dodgy relationships" at the heart of Britain's establishment, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said today.

Mr Clegg said that the judge-led inquiry into the hacking allegations provided a once-in-a-generation opportunity to clean up the media, politics and the police, by legislation if necessary. Politicians must be ready to accept Lord Justice Leveson's recommendations and act on them, he said.


The Deputy Prime Minister's comments came as Prime Minister David Cameron was under renewed pressure over his contacts with senior executives at News Corporation, after aides confirmed he had discussed the company's bid to take over BSkyB with them.

Downing Street said Mr Cameron could not rule out that BSkyB was mentioned during the Prime Minister's meetings with News Corp figures, including chairman Rupert Murdoch and former News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks, but insisted that none of his conversations were "inappropriate".

Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt - who had responsibility for making the final decision on the bid, which has now been dropped - told MPs last night: "The discussions the Prime Minister had on the BSkyB deal were irrelevant.

"They were irrelevant because the person who had the responsibility... the person who was making this decision was myself."

At a Whitehall press conference today, Mr Clegg said: "I think that we now have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to really clean up the murky practices and dodgy relationships which have taken root at the very heart of the British establishment between the press, politicians and the police.

"That is what we now need to get on and do. That's what the independent judge-led inquiry will allow us to do. We must act on any recommendations from that inquiry quickly, if necessary through legislation as well."

Mr Clegg said the hacking scandal, and allegations that police officers were paid by the press for information, had "shaken" faith in the police and brought public opinion of politicians to an even lower level.

Mr Clegg said Liberal Democrats had been raising concerns about phone-hacking even before the general election, and he was the first person in Government to demand a judge-led inquiry into the allegations.

And the Liberal Democrat leader confirmed that he had raised questions at the time of the creation of the coalition about Mr Cameron's decision to bring former News of the World editor Andy Coulson into the heart of the Government as Downing Street director of communications.

He stressed that the decision to appoint Mr Coulson was the Prime Minister's alone.

Asked whether he had challenged Mr Coulson's appointment, Mr Clegg said: "Of course there were constant conversations - particularly in the early stages of the Government - about how the Government was going to be formed, who was going to be appointed, who was going to be employed and so on.

"I asked questions about some of the decisions about who was being brought into government who had been active in opposition."

He added: "It was (Mr Cameron's) decision and he has been very frank and candid about the fact that he takes responsibility for it. In the same way that I take responsibility for appointments in my team, he takes responsibility for appointments to his team."

Liberal Democrats have not been implicated in the recent furore over politicians' relations with the press, but Mr Clegg has struggled to capitalise on this in the polls.

Today he sought to establish a distinctive position for his party, saying: "I don't think anyone should be surprised that the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives come at this issue from completely different directions.

"We were the only party in opposition to call for an inquiry into the phone-hacking allegations, even before the election.

"Going back further than that, we were the only party to campaign for new pluralism rules in the media. The Liberal Democrats have had a particularly unique role in raising issues which were ignored by the other parties for years and years, most notably by the last Labour government.

"I was the first person in Government to say it had to be a judge-led inquiry. I was the first person in Government to say that Rupert Murdoch needed to reconsider his bid.

"I was the first person in Government to say we needed to cover not just the police and press but politicians as well.

"On each and every one of these counts, I pushed that case and thankfully we have now got the right kind of inquiry, which I think will go a long, long way to cleaning up what was a very, very unhealthy state of affairs."

He added: "I passionately believe in open, transparent balanced government where people are not in each other's pockets, and that is what I think we now have an opportunity to achieve over the next few months and years, and that is an opportunity I hope we will seize."

Shadow chancellor Ed Balls said Mr Cameron had made "a catastrophic error of judgment" by discussing the details of the BSkyB bid with News Corp executives at a time when it was being discussed by his Government.

Mr Balls said it was "fine" for ministers to meet newspaper editors and proprietors to discuss the state of the nation and their Government's policies.

But he told Sky News: "That is a completely different issue from Government ministers who have a power to influence commercial decisions talking directly to executives who stand to benefit from those commercial decisions.

"What happened yesterday was that the Prime Minister evaded and evaded all day and in the end Jeremy Hunt had to admit the Prime Minister had discussed the details of the BSkyB bid."

Mr Balls said the Prime Minister should make clear whether the BSkyB bid was discussed at a private lunch he had with Ms Brooks and News Corp deputy chief operating officer James Murdoch around Christmas.

"If that was what was being discussed on Christmas Day or Boxing Day in Oxfordshire, the Prime Minister should set this out clearly," said Mr Balls.

"It's fine to meet editors and it's fine to meet proprietors, though you have to be careful," he said. "But you shouldn't be discussing commercially sensitive issues with executives while decisions are being made.

"If the Prime Minister didn't do that, he should make it clear. And if he did do that, he has got some very serious questions to answer."

Yesterday, Business Secretary Vince Cable claimed he had been "vindicated" in adopting a tough stance on News Corp's bid to take over BSkyB.

He said: "Clearly my judgments were vindicated.

"I think more important last autumn, when the takeover bid could easily have gone through, I stopped it happening, I referred it to the regulators."

Mr Clegg said today that history had "borne out" Mr Cable's reservations, which he first aired unwittingly to undercover reporters.

The Deputy Prime Minister said: "I don't think this is a time for anyone to start seeking retrospectively to claim credit one way or the other.

"Vince made his reservations about the BSkyB deal spectacularly clear - if in unorthodox circumstances - and to that extent, yes, Vince's reservations on the nature of the deal have been borne out by events.

"But, frankly, the events that have taken place since Vince made those comments are quite different from anything Vince or I could have predicted at the time."

Mr Clegg called for a revamped press industry with a new regulatory body to replace the Press Complaints Commission (PCC).

"I want a media landscape which is free," said Mr Clegg, adding: "I don't want an out-of-control press to undermine the integrity of a free press."

But he claimed he did not want "politicians making up the rules and I don't want politicians to start predicting how the media should be configured in the future".

Mr Clegg went on: "The PCC can't carry on in its present form - it is judge and jury.

"You've got this ludicrous situation where the committee which is actually responsible for supervising the code of conduct by which editors should be judged is populated only by editors, chaired by the editor of the Daily Mail (Paul Dacre).

"We have got to have independent regulation - independent of Government (and) independent of the press - able to adjudicate and able to impose sanctions as well."

Speaking at an event in Birmingham organised by the Birmingham Mail newspaper, Labour leader Ed Miliband said the hacking scandal underlined the need for social responsibility.

He said: "One of the things that has struck me about the last couple of weeks is that we talk a lot in our society about the responsibilities of the powerless - people without power, people on benefits and others - and it's important they show responsibility.

"But the reason why people have been so shaken by recent events is they have shown such irresponsibility among the powerful in our society."

He added: "In order to restore trust - and this is why it's important we get the truth in all respects - we've got to make sure once and for all we ensure the kind of events we have seen don't happen again.

"We also have to... ask ourselves more widely what it says about us as a country.

"Why did these things happen? Why did it get to a stage where it was thought it was OK to listen to (and) delete the voicemail messages on Milly Dowler's phone?

"That requires us to look into our soul as a country and say 'What standards do we want set?'

"That is an issue for all of us."

Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator jailed in the phone-hacking scandal, said today he will not speak out about his involvement in the phone hacking scandal until the police inquiry is completed.

He released a short statement through his solicitor after News International announced it had stopped paying his legal fees.

The statement said: "As I made clear yesterday, because of the ongoing police inquiry and the possibility of further criminal proceedings, I cannot speak further at present.

"I am advised that this will remain the position until after the conclusion of the police inquiry."

Andrew Grice: Why Tories don't want the hacking inquiry to drag on

21st July 2011

"It's time to move on from phone hacking to the real issues that concern the public." That was the line Conservative whips gave the party's MPs yesterday. Privately, some Tory MPs fear it will be hard to "move on". The hacking scandal is so big that it has the capacity to fill the summer vacuum. "We need a game-changer – I just hope Gaddafi goes soon," one Tory minister quipped. The parliamentary recess, which starts today, may deprive Ed Miliband of some of the opportunities he has exploited well recently. But speeches can be made and press conferences held outside the Commons.

One danger for David Cameron is that the processes currently unfolding – the 10 separate inquiries and investigations into criminality at the News of the World under Andy Coulson – will rumble on for years, disrupting normal business and the party's capacity to fight elections.


The first big electoral test will be the battle to be London Mayor next May, a rematch between Boris Johnson and his predecessor Ken Livingstone. Both the Tories and Labour will be desperate to win because the capital is a crucial general election battleground.

Mr Johnson's initial dismissal of the hacking allegations as "codswallop" may return to haunt him. He will fast-track the appointment of a successor to Sir Paul Stephenson, the outgoing Metropolitan Police Commissioner, and will distance himself from Mr Cameron when he needs to.

While the economy, the NHS and the state of public services after the cuts will be the main issues at the 2015 general election, hacking could easily make waves until then. As the inquiries take evidence and report, the issue will remain in the headlines.

Although Lord Justice Leveson will produce his first report on the media in a year, he will not make real progress on the second stage on phone hacking until after the prosecutions and court cases arising from the current police investigation. That could easily take two or three years.

Tracking down potential victims of hacking could also take the police years and more hor- rific cases could emerge.

The fear in some Tory minds is that, because he appointed Andy Coulson, the former News of the World editor, Mr Cameron has the most to lose.

Cameron extends remit of media inquiry to take in BBC

The terms of reference for the hacking inquiry were widened yesterday to include the BBC, other broadcasters and social networking media.

David Cameron announced the expansion as he unveiled the members of the panel that will examine media practices.

The inquiry will look at the phone-hacking scandal specifically, but also at broader issues involving politics, the media and the police. The panel members were named as:

Lord Leveson

Chair. Best known as the barrister who prosecuted the serial killer Rosemary West. Also chairs the Sentencing Council, which draws up guidelines for courts.

Shami Chakrabarti

As director of the civil liberties pressure group Liberty she has strong views on press freedom and the intrusive state.

Sir Paul Scott-Lee

The former chief constable of the West Midlands has not dined with Rebekah Brooks so far as we know.

David Currie

The economist and Labour life peer was founding chairman of Ofcom in 2002.

Elinor Goodman

Political correspondent of Channel 4 when the channel launched in 1982, and political editor for two decades.

George Jones

Long-serving political editor of The Daily Telegraph. Colleagues have joked that the panel's report will be "by George Jones – with extra reporting by Lord Leveson".

Sir David Bell

Former chair of the Financial Times and head of the Media Standards Trust until his appointment to the panel yesterday.

Like Andrew Grice on The Independent on Facebook for updates


Olympic newspaper deal ended

By Damian Spellman 21st July 2011

News International's media partnership deal with British athletes preparing for next summer's London Olympics has ended as a result of the News of the World's demise.

The group had entered into a contract with Team 2012 which gave it exclusive access to competitors ahead of the Games, but the closure of the paper at the centre of phone-hacking allegations means that cannot be fulfilled.


As a result, the deal is under review with a range of alternatives under consideration.

A statement from Team 2012 said: "The Team 2012 joint venture, including Visa as its presenting partner, has had a contract with the News International Group as its official media partner.

"As a result of the closure of News of the World, the contract can no longer be fulfilled as originally envisaged.

"All parties in the joint venture remain totally committed to Team 2012 and are working to make sure that we continue to give the 1,200-plus athletes from Team 2012 Visa the best chance of achieving success by competing for Team GB and Paralympics GB at London 2012.

"To help drive national support for Team 2012, we are now exploring media partnerships across a range of channels."

Under the agreement, the Sun, The Times and the Sunday Times would have been able to use the title "Official Newspaper of Team 2012".


Steve Richards: Cameron's immaturity lies exposed

21st July 2011

His errors in this affair are part of a pattern of policy making. They are not fatal but they damage him


The Murdochs fly out and David Cameron flies back from his trip to South Africa that he wisely did not cancel. The spotlight moves from once-powerful non-elected media executives to the elected Prime Minister who is not as powerful as he can seem.

There are five issues that relate directly to Cameron in this long-running drama, his appointment of Andy Coulson, his extensive contacts with News International, the activities of his chief of staff Ed Llewellyn, his role in the BSkyB deal that almost came to spectacular fruition and his response to the firestorm of the last three weeks, the first crisis in which he, rather than Nick Clegg, has been the centre of attention. How damaging are each of the issues and is there more to come?

On Coulson, Cameron has opted for candour. He could do little else. The Prime Minister could hardly deny there was no issue when his former senior adviser had been arrested. I respect Cameron for insisting that Coulson is innocent until proven guilty and understand why he has found it difficult to establish distance from a close colleague. Leaders are human. He has been expansive about his personal responsibility in the appointment and the almighty apology, in a form yet to be specified, that he will give if Coulson is found guilty. The association damages Cameron permanently, as it roots him so vividly in the old, dying era of subservience to a media empire and raises questions about judgement. But the steps of this particular Cameron/Coulson dance are familiar and will not change until the final legal verdict on his former press secretary.

Cameron's many meetings with News International executives are not especially surprising. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were equally assiduous. Not for the first time, the attack of the current Labour leadership is stifled by the precedent set by New Labour. The precedents mean there is limited space for any effective Labour attack about Cameron's excessive meetings with Rebekah Brooks and others.

Such gatherings will diminish. In one of many revealing exchanges yesterday, one MP reminded Cameron of Murdoch's semi-joke on Tuesday that he wished prime ministers would "leave me alone". Cameron almost whispered in response that Murdoch and others would be left alone from now on. He sounded relieved. The severing of links is a big change in itself.

Cameron addressed convincingly questions about the intervention of his head of staff Ed Llewelyn who, in an email asked the then Assistant Commissioner John Yates, not to discuss the hacking investigation during a prime ministerial meeting. In another easily-missed aside, Cameron argued that Llewelyn was guiding the police towards not acting improperly. In terms of the PM's future this is a non-story going nowhere. But in contrast to Cameron's expansive answers on Coulson, the number of meetings with media executives, his relations with the police, he was strikingly evasive about his discussions on the BSkyB deal. The evasiveness is much more significant precisely because he had been painstakingly transparent on all other issues. It was deliberate. He had a formulaic answer about having no "inappropriate" conversations but refused to explain what "appropriate" exchanges had taken place. Instead he cited Brooks' response on Tuesday in which she said there were no discussions that could not have taken place in front of the committee.

From these cryptic responses we need to decode, a need that is in itself illuminating. It is clear the BSkyB deal was discussed when Cameron met NI executives. Cameron recognises this is embarrassing or he would have been more specific. The similarity of the formulaic responses of Brooks on Tuesday and Cameron yesterday to this point suggest it is even possible there were discussions between both sides on how to handle it, although this could not have happened given the explosive nature of any contact in the current climate.

Brooks's neatly imprecise answer gives her the space to have made any point to Cameron in relation to the bid. Cameron had "appropriate" discussions, but offered no definition of the term, so he could have said quite a lot too. This part of the story is not over. Cameron is a sharp reader of the rhythms of politics. He knows this could land him in trouble or else he would have stuck with the strategy of transparent candour applied on other fronts.

Cameron has received most criticism, not least from other Conservatives, for his response to the crisis over the last fortnight. On the whole that is unfair. He was stuck with his decision to appoint Coulson, a decision from which there is no escape. It cannot be unmade. When he realised how big this had become he moved fast, so fast that when he met Ed Miliband last week to discuss the terms of the judicial inquiry he agreed to every suggestion made by the Labour leader. Some of his responses have been puny in their desperation such as the unfounded onslaught on Miliband's adviser Tom Baldwin, disgracefully implying equivalence with Coulson, but he has kept afloat in the storm.

The crisis will not bring Cameron down and should not do so. Nonetheless there are always reasons why events erupt around a Prime Minister. The deepest reason is that Cameron and George Osborne are not yet fully formed political leaders. They acquired power at a relatively young age and with no previous ministerial experience. Their political strategy is still derivative rather than fresh and authentic. In this case they wanted an Alastair Campbell to get them close to the tabloids in the same way they could not in the end resist a return to economic policies that led Margaret Thatcher to landslide election victories. Even this week Cameron's entourage seemed to be partly performing on the basis of Tony Blair in a crisis. When Boris Johnson appeared to be unhelpful they briefed "Boris is Boris" in the same way that Blair used to declare with a resigned smile "Peter is Peter". It does not feel wholly original.

Cameron and Osborne are the equivalent of a talented young footballers picked to play in a World Cup Final. They acquired power, New Labour style, in their party (did they consult colleagues widely about the appointment of Coulson?) and implement power in government New Labour style (did Cameron consult widely about the wisdom of meeting NI executives as the BSkyB deal loomed?).

To make sense of the Blair leadership it is important to appreciate that he had no previous ministerial experience. Cameron is a young Prime Minister in a much more epic context, a hung parliament and a deep economic crisis. His errors in this affair are part of a pattern in policy making. They are not fatal, but damage him. He has risen to the top very quickly and he must hope that in the new architecture that will emerge from recent crises he will have no choice but to grow into a very big, authentic leader or risk being swept away by events.

Like Steve Richards on The Independent on Facebook for updates

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-a-question-of-judgement-2317653.html

Leading article: A question of judgement

Fresh from his latest mistimed visit to Africa, the Prime Minister yesterday tried to answer the myriad questions that had exploded on to the political agenda in his absence. He dealt with the police by elaborating on the measures announced by the Home Secretary. He dealt with the media by announcing a broadening of Lord Justice Leveson's inquiry beyond newspapers. The Murdochs' withdrawal of the bid for BSkyB partially drew the sting of questions relating to contacts he might or might not have had with News Corp on the subject. But on the killer question – the recruitment as his media adviser of Andy Coulson – even the Murdoch tactics of apology were not, and could not be, enough.

Not that Mr Cameron truly apologised. In a disturbingly Blairite non-apology, the Prime Minister said "sorry" for the furore, while reserving the right to apologise for the actual appointment, if and when Mr Coulson was shown to have lied. He also admitted that, with hindsight, "I would not have offered him the job and I expect that he would not have taken it". The trouble is that he did offer him the job, and Mr Coulson did take it. And however well Mr Coulson executed his duties at No 10, it is what happened when he edited the News of the World that will define him – and the quality of Mr Cameron's judgement.

Andy Coulson is destined to cast a shadow over the rest of Mr Cameron's term in office. The wheels of justice, as the deliberations of inquiries, turn exceedingly slowly. Even if Mr Coulson is never charged with a crime, the Leveson inquiry and the police investigations guarantee that his name will return time and again to the headlines, and the Prime Minister can do nothing to wrestle himself free. His preoccupation with public relations helped to make Mr Cameron who he is; from now on, it will burden, if not break, his premiership.


Rupert Murdoch is driven to the airport yesterday after his three-hour grilling

GETTY IMAGES

Rupert Murdoch is driven to the airport yesterday after his three-hour grilling

How the answers given to MPs have simply raised more questions

Testimonies from the Murdochs and Brooks on Tuesday still leave key gaps in the story

By Martin Hickman and Cahal Milmo  21st July 2011

1. The 2007 internal report

Paul Farrelly MP "James Murdoch, can you tell us about the file of emails, the so-called internal report that was discovered, allegedly — we read in the pages of The Sunday Times — in the offices of Harbottle & Lewis. Can you tell us a bit more about when that was discovered, when you first came to know about it and what is in it?"

James Murdoch "I first came to know about that earlier this year, in 2011."

Farrelly "Can you be more precise?"

James Murdoch "It would have been in the spring time. I do not remember the exact date when I was told about it."

Farrelly "Before April?"

James Murdoch "April or May."

Why the exchange matters The report allegedly contained emails showing evidence of criminality, including payments to police. Mr Murdoch's answer means NI may have withheld this evidence from Operation Weeting for up to three months.

2. The 2010 DCMS report

Philip Davies MP "When our report was published, when you [Rebekah Brooks] were chief executive of News International... we found the evidence from News International was wholly unsatisfactory. We referred to the collective amnesia in our report, and felt it was inconceivable Clive Goodman was a rogue reporter. When you were chief executive of News International, at the time the report was published, did you read it?"

Rebekah Brooks "Yes, I did. I'm not saying I read every word, but I read a large majority of it. I particularly read the criticisms addressed to the company, and I can only hope that, from the evidence you have heard from us today, you know that we have really stepped up our investigation. Rupert and James Murdoch have been here today, being very open and very honest with you... I hope you think that when we saw the civil disclosure in December 2010 we acted swiftly and promptly to deal with it... I am not saying we have not made mistakes, but the Metropolitan Police have repeatedly said, as you heard last week – or the Home Affairs Committee heard – that there was no need for a further criminal investigation. So I think everyone involved in 2007 would say now that mistakes were made. But I hope you feel we have responded appropriately and responsibly since we saw the information in 2010."

Why the exchange matters News International executives only reviewed the internal report lodged with the lawyers Harbottle & Lewis in "Easter" 2011. Then they waited up to three months before passing the information to police (see No 1, above).

3. Neville Thurlbeck

Tom Watson MP "In 2008, why did you not dismiss News of the World chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck, following the Mosley case?"

Rupert Murdoch "I'd never heard of him."

Why the exchange matters This is an extraordinary claim. Mr Thurlbeck was the chief reporter of the News of the World, Mr Murdoch's best-selling paper, and had delivered a succession of front-page stories. Max Mosley's court victory in 2008 – in which the judge suggested Mr Thurlbeck was an unreliable witness – was prominently reported.

4. Payments to police

Tom Watson "Can I take you back to 2003? Are you aware that in March of that year, Rebekah Brooks gave evidence to this Committee admitting paying police?"

Rupert Murdoch "I am now aware of that. I was not aware at the time. I am also aware that she amended that considerably, very quickly afterwards."

Watson "I think that she amended it seven or eight years afterwards."

Rupert Murdoch "Oh, I'm sorry."

Watson "Did you or anyone else at your organisation investigate this at the time?"

Rupert Murdoch "No."

Watson "Can you explain why?"

Rupert Murdoch "I didn't know of it, I'm sorry. This is not an excuse. Maybe it is an explanation of my laxity. The News of the World is less than 1 per cent of our company. I employ 53,000 people around the world who are proud and great and ethical and distinguished people. Perhaps I am spread watching and appointing people whom I trust to run those divisions."

Why the exchange matters News International appears to have been unconcerned the editor of its second-bestselling newspaper, The Sun, had apparently admitted bribing police. (In 2011, Ms Brooks clarified the remarks made in 2003, saying she had been speaking about the industry in general and knew of no such payments.)

Ian Burrell: So was Rupert putting on the pregnant pauses?

Rupert Murdoch for several years now has been losing cognitive function


The evidence is there online: Rupert Murdoch's faltering and bemused appearance at Westminster on Tuesday was not merely an example of his unusual conversational style, nor a deliberate act intended to win sympathy from a global audience.

The lost figure who struggled to answer, and sometimes to hear, the words of his questioners this week, shocked some investors in his company, News Corp.

"Those long pauses are a Murdoch characteristic which goes back a long time," claimed Trevor Kavanagh, one of the most senior figures on The Sun. "Those who portray him as a doddery old man are very far from the truth. He's an old man, there is no disguising that, but... he has a razor-sharp mind."

But when the media mogul was interviewed in 2003 by Jeff Randall, then the BBC Business Editor, he displayed a very different fluency.

Asked by Randall to compare the British economy to those in Europe and America, Murdoch offered lucid economic analysis. "I believe that if America can keep a growth rate of 4 or 5 per cent a year for four or five years, it's going to leave Europe even further behind. But that, again, comes to how is Brussels going to behave? What's going to happen with this new Constitution? What central powers will come in? How it will affect this economy. I'm one of those who think there are great dangers ahead."

Murdoch's biographer, Michael Wolff, was dismissive of ideas that the halting responses were an attempt to draw sympathy by a man determined to show his humility.

"This is the way that Rupert is. Within News Corp they try to tell you 'Oh, he's just thinking. Oh, he's just concentrating.' I have watched this up close and he literally departs this space for the moment. He can't focus on a conversation and he can't hear," he said, adding that there was an "Emperor's New Clothes" situation at News Corp.

"Everybody walks around that building in New York and that company worldwide and pretends that everything is fine. There is... this incredible denial about what's in front of your face: that Rupert Murdoch for several years now has been losing cognitive function."

Even those close to Murdoch for many years acknowledge the change. "Some people thought he was hamming up and deliberately appearing old and frail to win the sympathy vote. Others thought it was part of his general demeanour. I disagree," said one admirer.

"I thought he looked old and confused and slow. There are moments of intense lucidity but then he drifts away. I just think it's simply the ageing process. Had I been a professional investor I would not have been impressed with that performance."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/andy-coulson-was-not-given-toplevel-background-checks-2317928.html

Andy Coulson was not given top-level background checks

By Oliver Wright, Whitehall Editor 21st July 2011

Andy Coulson underwent only mid-level security vetting as David Cameron's communications chief at Downing Street.

That spared him the requirement of undergoing much more comprehensive and rigorous checks on his background. Had he been put through the higher level of security vetting there would have been detailed background checks on his finances and intensive interviews designed to find out if anything in his past might embarrass the Government.

His predecessors, Alastair Campbell and David Hill, who were Tony Blair's communications chiefs, and Michael Ellam, who was Gordon Brown's, all underwent the higher-level vetting. Mr Coulson's lower-grade clearance surprised some Whitehall insiders, who said that without a higher level of clearance he would have been barred from knowing much of the information that people like Mr Campbell would have regarded as essential to their jobs.

But the Cabinet Office said his job was different from Mr Campbell's and did not require him to attend events such as Cobra sessions and Cabinet meetings.

Crucially, Mr Coulson did not have the authority to order civil servants about, whereas Mr Campbell did.

Mr Cameron told the Commons yesterday that Mr Coulson had undergone "basic level" vetting and that he would not have been privy to the Government's most secret information. He added: "It was all done in the proper way, he was subject to the special advisers' code of conduct."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/key-news-corp-shareholder-backs-murdoch-2317929.html

Key News Corp shareholder backs Murdoch

By Lewis Smith

The Saudi billionaire who played a key role in Rebekah Brooks' departure from News International has voiced his full support for Rupert and James Murdoch.

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal issued a statement to say he remained confident that News Corp will continue to be a valuable long-term investment.

It was the Saudi's intervention in calling for Ms Brooks "to go" as News International chief executive that was seen as instrumental in her decision to resign and Rupert Murdoch's willingness to accept her resignation.

Prince Alwaleed has a 7 per cent stake in News Corp and is seen as an important ally of the Murdoch family. Last year News Corp spent $70m (£43m) on a stake in the Prince's Rotana media company.

Referring to the appearance of both men in front of a Commons committee on Tuesday, Prince Alwaleed said: "Rupert Murdoch and his son, James, answered all questions posed by (members of Parliament) with full honesty and integrity."

And he made it clear that he remained confident in News Corp as a business led by the Murdochs. He said: "I continue to see News Corp as a valuable and long-term investment and remain both supportive and confident in the leadership of Rupert and James Murdoch."

Ian Burrell: So was Rupert putting on the pregnant pauses?

Rupert Murdoch for several years now has been losing cognitive function

21st July 2011

The evidence is there online: Rupert Murdoch's faltering and bemused appearance at Westminster on Tuesday was not merely an example of his unusual conversational style, nor a deliberate act intended to win sympathy from a global audience.

The lost figure who struggled to answer, and sometimes to hear, the words of his questioners this week, shocked some investors in his company, News Corp.

A comparison of interviews available online demonstrates how time has caught up with News Corp's founder and undermines suggestions by Murdoch loyalists yesterday that hesitation before answers is a long-standing Rupert trait.

"Those long pauses are a Murdoch characteristic which goes back a long time," claimed Trevor Kavanagh, one of the most senior figures on The Sun. "Those who portray him as a doddery old man are very far from the truth. He's an old man, there is no disguising that, but... he has a razor-sharp mind."

But when the media mogul was interviewed in 2003 by Jeff Randall, then the BBC Business Editor, he displayed a very different fluency.

Asked by Randall to compare the British economy to those in Europe and America, Murdoch offered lucid economic analysis. "I believe that if America can keep a growth rate of 4 or 5 per cent a year for four or five years, it's going to leave Europe even further behind. But that, again, comes to how is Brussels going to behave? What's going to happen with this new Constitution? What central powers will come in? How it will affect this economy. I'm one of those who think there are great dangers ahead."

Murdoch's biographer, Michael Wolff, was dismissive of ideas that the halting responses were an attempt to draw sympathy by a man determined to show his humility.

"This is the way that Rupert is. Within News Corp they try to tell you 'Oh, he's just thinking. Oh, he's just concentrating.' I have watched this up close and he literally departs this space for the moment. He can't focus on a conversation and he can't hear," he said, adding that there was an "Emperor's New Clothes" situation at News Corp.

"Everybody walks around that building in New York and that company worldwide and pretends that everything is fine. There is... this incredible denial about what's in front of your face: that Rupert Murdoch for several years now has been losing cognitive function."

Even those close to Murdoch for many years acknowledge the change. "Some people thought he was hamming up and deliberately appearing old and frail to win the sympathy vote. Others thought it was part of his general demeanour. I disagree," said one admirer.

"I thought he looked old and confused and slow. There are moments of intense lucidity but then he drifts away. I just think it's simply the ageing process. Had I been a professional investor I would not have been impressed with that performance."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/pm-calls-for-foreign-police-to-take-top-jobs-2317927.html

PM calls for foreign police to take top jobs

By Lewis Smith 21st July 2011

David Cameron has suggested that foreign police chiefs could be brought in to help drive out corruption and complacency.

Mr Cameron said the rule that now bars senior officers from abroad from being allowed to take up senior posts in the British forces could be dropped.

"At the moment the police system is too closed," he told MPs. "There are too few, and arguably too similar, candidates for the top jobs. I want to see radical proposals for how we can open up our police force and bring in fresh leadership."

The comments were made as confidence in the police fell amid concerns they had failed to investigate hacking allegations properly, were too close to media organisations, and that they sold information to journalists.





What did PM tell Murdoch about the BSkyB takeover?

Cameron admits he may have discussed controversial deal

By Andrew Grice and Oliver Wright
21st Jul y 2011
From The Independant- United Kingdom

David Cameron and Andy Coulson at The Millies, an event for military heroes, in 2009

David Cameron and Andy Coulson at The Millies, an event for military heroes, in 2009


David Cameron admitted that he may have discussed the bid by News Corp for full control of BSkyB during his 27 meetings with Murdoch executives since last year's election. Downing Street had previously insisted that the £8bn takeover was not mentioned.

Mr Cameron also came under pressure to explain why he failed to review Andy Coulson's position as No 10's director of communications last September when The New York Times alleged that hacking was widespread while he was editor of the News of the World. The same report led to Scotland Yard ending the PR role of Neil Wallis, Mr Coulson's friend and deputy at the NOTW. Both Mr Coulson and Mr Wallis have recently been arrested by police investigating hacking.

Last night Cameron aides offered the surprise disclosure that Mr Wallis had "probably" visited Mr Coulson in Downing Street since last year's election, although they insisted that any informal advice to Mr Coulson took place before the election.

Senior Palace officials also believe Mr Cameron's office was "aware" of their misgivings about him ever hiring Mr Coulson in the first place, The Independent understands, following the jailing of a reporter and a private detective for hacking into the phones of royal aides.

During a Commons statement, the Prime Minister was asked on nine occasions whether he had discussed the now-aborted News Corp bid for BSkyB. He replied that he had not had any inappropriate conversations about the takeover. Later, aides suggested Mr Cameron may have been lobbied by Murdoch executives but would have merely told them the decision was a matter for Jeremy Hunt, the Culture Secretary.

Last night Mr Hunt appeared to confirm that the issue did arise during the Prime Minister's meetings. He told MPs the discussions were "irrelevant because the person making this decision was myself". Labour described Mr Cameron as "slippery" and urged him to publish full details of any talks with Murdoch executives about the bid. "Until he does so there will continue to be serious questions about his judgement," said Ivan Lewis, the shadow Culture Secretary.

However, Mr Cameron settled Tory nerves by taking a tougher line on Mr Coulson. He told the Commons he was "extremely sorry" for the furore and that "with hindsight" he would never have recruited him. "You live and you learn – and believe me, I have learnt." He said Mr Coulson should face "severe" criminal charges if it turned out that assurances he gave that he knew nothing about phone hacking were lies. "If it turns out I have been lied to, that would be a moment for a profound apology, and in that event I can tell you I will not fall short," he said. He insisted that Mr Coulson should be seen as "innocent until proven guilty".

The Prime Minister dismissed Labour's attacks over the scandal as "conspiracy theories" and "political point-scoring". Despite private fears among Tory MPs about his links to Mr Coulson, they rallied strongly behind him when he addressed their weekly meeting last night. He told the 1922 Committee his actions on hacking had been "decisive, frank and transparent" and the issue was not raised when backbenchers asked him questions.

Ed Miliband seized on Downing Street's plea to Scotland Yard not to brief Mr Cameron on hacking last September after The New York Times article appeared: "The Prime Minister was caught in a tragic conflict of loyalty between the standards of integrity that people should expect of him and his staff and his personal allegiance to Mr Coulson. He made the wrong choice."

The Labour leader suggested Mr Cameron's "conflict of interest" led to Sir Paul Stephenson's resignation as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner on Sunday after it emerged that the force had hired Mr Wallis as an adviser.

He said: "Sir Paul Stephenson was trapped between a Home Secretary angry about not being told about the hiring of Mr Wallis and Sir Paul's belief, in his own words, that doing so would have compromised the Prime Minister."

In the Commons, Mr Cameron agreed to examine allegations that an unnamed senior government official was subjected to "disgraceful and illegal" phone hacking and hostile media briefing while Mr Coulson worked in Downing Street. He said he would look "closely" at the claims by the former Labour minister Nick Raynsford and refer them to Sir Gus O'Donnell, the Cabinet Secretary.

Mr Raynsford had asked: "Will the Prime Minister confirm that, a year ago, during the period when Mr Coulson was director of communications, the Cabinet Secretary was alerted to evidence of illegal phone hacking, covert surveillance and hostile media briefing directed against a senior official in the government service? What action, if any, was taken to investigate what appears to have been disgraceful and illegal conduct close to the heart of government?"

The key exchanges

Ben Bradshaw In the Prime Minister's conversations with the Murdochs [and] Mrs Brooks, was there ever any mention of the BSkyB bid?

PM Perhaps [Mr Bradshaw] will now be transparent, as he was culture secretary, about all of the contacts he has had with News International over many years.

John Cryer The Prime Minister said that he had commissioned a company to do a basic background check on Coulson. I am asking for the name of the company.

PM We did hire a company to do a basic background check.

Jack Straw When the Prime Minister read of the investigation in The New York Times last year, what did he do?

PM There was no information in that article that would lead me to change my mind, but if it turns out that [Coulson] knew about hacking, it will be subject to criminal prosecutions.

Nick Raynsford Will the Prime Minister confirm that, during the period when Mr Coulson was director of communications, the Cabinet Secretary was alerted to evidence of illegal phone hacking? What action was taken to investigate?

PM In the period that Andy Coulson worked at No 10 there was no complaint about the way he did his job.

Related articles from the Independant UK

To preserve these artilces in the public interest copies of the articles can be found further down this page or at on

www.newsoftheworld/IndependantMurdochNews



WWW.INLNEWS.COM  WWW.INLTV.COM  INL.ORG   INL.GOV   INL.CO.NZ  WWW.AWN.COM  
WWW.AWNTV.COM  
INLNews  YahooMail  HotMail  GMail AOLMail  MyWayMail USA MAIL
USA Weekly News EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE  
Visit International News Limited  for the best values on:  domain names 
. 
Fringe Shows Have Talent   Bebo    YouTube    MySpace    Twitter  FaceBook.  
USA Weekly News EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE  

Click For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores 
Triumph of Truth (Who's Watching The Watchers?) 7 Volumes - The Australian Weekend  
Click here to get you daily dose of  Real  Independent USA News with Amy Goodman at Domocracy Now
 CNNWorld   IsraelVideoNs   INLNs NYTimes   WashNs   
WorldMedia   JapanNs   AusNs  WorldVideoNs   
WorldFinance   ChinaDaily 
 IndiaNs   USADaily   BBC   EuroNs ABCAust   WANs   NZNs 
 QldNs   MelbAge AdelaideNs   TasNs 
  ABCTas   DarwinNs  USAMail 

Query over James Murdoch evidence Press Association

James Murdoch could be asked to clarify his evidence to MPs this week after it was 
James Murdoch could be asked to clarify his evidence to the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee, chairman John Whittingdale has said.
His remarks came after claims from two former senior News International staff that the company's chairman had been "mistaken" in Tuesday's hearing, which he attended with his father Rupert.
Mr Murdoch Junior told the committee he was "not aware" of an email suggesting the practice of phone hacking at the News of the World went wider than one rogue reporter.
But in a statement issued on Thursday night, former News of the World editor Colin Myler and ex-News International legal manager Tom Crone said they had informed Mr Murdoch of the email.
Conservative MP Mr Whittingdale said he had not yet seen the statement, but that Mr Murdoch had already agreed to write to the committee on various points he had been unable to immediately address at the hearing.
The MP, who stressed the committee would not be recalled on the matter, said: "I'm sure if the statement suggests there's conflict between what Colin Myler is saying and what he said, we will ask him to answer that as well."
The issue hinges on a settlement paid to Professional Footballers' Association chief executive Gordon Taylor in 2008, worth a reported £700,000, after he brought a damages claim against the News of the World.
At the committee hearing, Tom Watson MP asked James Murdoch: "When you signed off the Taylor payment, did you see or were you made aware of the full Neville e-mail, the transcript of the hacked voicemail messages?"
He replied: "No, I was not aware of that at the time." He went on to say: "There was every reason to settle the case, given the likelihood of losing the case and given the damages - we had received counsel - that would be levied."
In their statement, Mr Myler and Mr Crone said: "Just by way of clarification relating to Tuesday's CMS Select Committee hearing, we would like to point out that James Murdoch's recollection of what he was told when agreeing to settle the Gordon Taylor litigation was mistaken. In fact, we did inform him of the 'for Neville' email which had been produced to us by Gordon Taylor's lawyers."


Former NOTW Executive Sacked 
By The Sun  21st July 2011

A former News Of The World executive has been sacked by The Sun after serious allegations of wrongdoing relating to his time at the Sunday title, Sky sources say.

The employee dismissed is thought to be Matt Nixson, who had been features editor at The Sun since last January.

It is understood he was escorted out of the newsroom by four security guards and his computer seized.

It came as a former editor and a former legal boss at the NOTW claimed James Murdoch was "mistaken" in a statement about phone-hacking he made to a parliamentary committee.

Colin Myler, the now-defunct tabloid's editor in 2005, and its then international legal manager Tom Crone made the claim in a joint statement.

They say they had told Mr Murdoch of an email that contained transcripts of 35 hacked telephone messages between former Professional Footballers' Association boss Gordon Taylor and PFA legal advisor Jo Armstrong.

The significance of the e-mail is that it casts doubt on the original NOTW defence that it was a lone rogue reporter, Royal Editor Clive Goodman, who used private investigator Glenn Mulcaire to hack phones.

Mr Murdoch told the Commons culture and media select committee he had not been aware of the email when approving an out-of-court settlement for Taylor.

The email was sent to Mr Mulcaire by an unnamed junior reporter at the NOTW, featuring the line "Hello, this is the transcript for Neville" - referring to Neville Thurbeck, the NOTW's chief reporter in 2005.

Mr Myler and Mr Crone's statement says: "Just by way of clarification relating to Tuesday's CMS Select Committee hearing, we would like to point out that James Murdoch's recollection of what he was told when agreeing to settle the Gordon Taylor litigation was mistaken.

"In fact, we did inform him of the 'for Neville' email which had been produced to us by Gordon Taylor's lawyers."

During the select committee meeting, MP Tom Watson had said: "James… when you signed off the Taylor payment, did you see or were you made aware of the full Neville e-mail, the transcript of the hacked voicemail messages?"

Mr Murdoch said: "No, I was not aware of that at the time."

Mr Watson replied: "But you paid an astronomical sum, and there was no reason to."

Mr Murdoch then said: "There was every reason to settle the case, given the likelihood of losing the case and given the damages-we had received counsel-that would be levied."

Responding to the statement from Mr Myler and Mr Crone, News Corporation have said James Murdoch sticks by his testimony.

John Whittingdale, chairman of the Culture Committee, told Sky News his committee would be asking James Murdoch to respond to the claims by Mr Myler and Mr Crone.

He said that during Tuesday's hearing Mr Murdoch had promised to write to the committee answering those questions he was unable to answer in his evidence and he would now be asked to answer the Myler/Crone claims in his letter.

But Mr Whittingdale said the committee would not be calling James Murdoch to appear before the committee again since Parliament is now in recess.


Exclusive: Mirror Warns MPs Over Hacking Claims

The publisher of the Daily and Sunday Mirror has warned MPs against repeating “erroneous and inaccurate” comments implying that the tabloids were implicated in the phone-hacking scandal that has engulfed the rival group, News International.

I have learnt that Sly Bailey, chief executive of Trinity Mirror, has today written to John Whittingdale, chairman of the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, to express her anger over comments made during Tuesday’s hearing with Rupert Murdoch, chairman and chief executive of News Corporation, and his son James.

The warning shot from the Trinity Mirror boss underlines the concerns of other newspaper publishers about being drawn into the hacking scandal. A quick glimpse at the recent share price performance of News Corporation (owner of News International, which published the now-defunct News of the World) underlines why that would be the case.

During Tuesday’s hearing, Louise Mensch, a Conservative member of the committee, suggested that remarks made in the diaries of Piers Morgan, the former Mirror (and News of the World) editor, confirmed that the Mirror had been guilty of illegally intercepting voicemails.

In fact, Mensch had got her facts wrong. What Morgan wrote in his book was this:

“Apparently if you don’t change the standard security code that every phone comes with, then anyone can call your number and, if you don’t answer, tap in the standard four digit code to hear all your messages. I’ll change mine just in case, but it makes me wonder how many public figures and celebrities are aware of this little trick.”

In today’s letter, Bailey, who has run Trinity Mirror since 2003, said that if left uncorrected, Mensch’s comments could cause the company and its newspapers “serious reputational damage”. She also suggested that the status of the select committee enhanced the risk of those comments becoming accepted as fact.

Worryingly for Trinity Mirror, David Cameron, the prime minister, already appears to have done so. During yesterday’s statement on the hacking furore, he named the Mirror as a potentially guilty party.

This is what Mensch asked James Murdoch, chairman of News International and deputy chief operating officer of News Corporation, on Tuesday:

“You do not appear to have asked Piers Morgan, who is now a celebrity anchor at CNN, any questions at all about phone hacking. As a former editor of the Daily Mirror, he said in his book The Insider recently that that “little trick” of entering a “Standard four digit code” will allow “anyone” to call a number and “hear all your messages”. In that book, he boasted that using that “little trick” enabled him to win scoop of the year on a story about Sven-Goran Eriksson. That is a former editor of the Daily Mirror being very open about his personal use of phone hacking.”

It has triggered a furious response from Morgan, who is this week filming in Los Angeles. In a statement used by other news outlets yesterday, he said:

“For the record, at my time at the Mirror and the News of the World I have never hacked a phone, told any body to hack a phone or published any stories based on the hacking of a phone. At my time at the Mirror and the News of the World I have never hacked a phone, told anybody to hack a phone or published any stories based on the hacking of a phone."

Mensch has refused to apologise or retract her comments.

It strikes me that there are a couple of other points worth making about Bailey’s intervention today.

Firstly, it would be surprising if she had written that letter unless her company had conducted a thorough investigation to be sure that its hands were clean. Based on conversations I have had with people connected to Trinity Mirror, though, I’m not sure that a probe of that nature has actually been conducted.

Regardless of the existence of parliamentary privilege, it also seems odd (and a major misjudgement) that Mr Cameron would have made his remark yesterday unless he has sure that other newspaper groups including the Mirror would be implicated in the hacking affair.

He has repeatedly said during recent weeks that voicemail interception was an industry-wide activity and not confined to News International.

Paul Dacre, editor-in-chief of the Daily Mail, told MPs this week that he had never published a story based on illegally-obtained information.

Trinity Mirror declined to comment on the letter to Mr Whittingdale.

Comments:
Posted by: NormalBloke on July 21, 2011 8:20 PM

    jensen: you're right on all counts. Its not left v right, it is widespread and its about time it was sorted out.  The relationship between parties, newspapers, broadcasters and police is all wrong.   I have read summaries of the ICO report and ask those interested why was it not acted upon at the time.

Posted by: ostler on July 21, 2011 8:17 PM  The Information Commissioners report ‘What price privacy?’ ( http://tinyurl.com/icprivnow ) reported that 305 journalists had been identified during Operation Motorman as customers driving the illegal trade in confidential personal information.
    Of these 89 worked for the Mirror , Sunday Mirror and People

Posted by: Jensen on July 21, 2011 8:05 PM:    This scandal is being reduced to being about left and right  It isn't. It's about right and wrong.   It really is time people realized these papers are raping information and breaking the law -- in order to sell you trash. Don't ask me to explain the ICO report. Read it, it's online   And once again, the Daily Mirror and many other outlets are all in the trough together, which means their denials are in effect insults to your intelligence and outright lies.   Still want to defend them?

Posted by: NormalBloke on July 21, 2011 7:27 PM:   fruitcase.   What did the ICO report 2006 say - why didnt labour come so stong at that time?

Posted by: Groucho6 on July 21, 2011 7:24 PM:  jensen...........it seems lies roll off your tongue......has the part of your brain with a concience out of action?

Posted by: Jensen on July 21, 2011 6:48 PM:   Dear Mirror Group,    Instead of trying to distract the focus of attention by raving about party politics and conspiracies, why not simply clean up your rank mess of a paper?    Instead of playing party politics and accusing people of 'lying', why don't you step up, have some integrity and come clean about why your paper is consistently associated with hacking and other dirty tricks?  Sincerely,   Someone who carefully followed Operation Motorman.

Posted by: Jensen on July 21, 2011 6:46 PM:    Dear Mirror Group,    What's sadder is staff at The Mirror blogging here instead of cleaning up their rank mess of a paper.   Instead of playing party politics and accusing people of 'lying', why don't you step up, have some integrity and come clean about why your paper is consistently associated with hacking and other dirty tricks     Sincerely,    Someone who carefully followed Operation Motorman.

Posted by: Groucho6 on July 21, 2011 6:45 PM:   If Rebekka can appear before the commitee,what devious forces are preventing Coulson being ordered to appear.It would be naturally extremely interesting for his ex colleagues to hear his precise answers as well as the general public..........something fishy how he has not yet appeared

Posted by: Groucho6 on July 21, 2011 6:36 PM:    The person accusing coulson of giving bribing money to the police is standing by his accusation and it lead to coulsons arrest......If it is PROVEN that his accusation was false then he like Mersch should be up before a judge

Posted by: Humphrey Pumphrey on July 21, 2011 6:23 PM:    Groucho6   And what about those people, like you, who stated that Coulson is guilty without having a shred of evidence and despite the fact he has not even been charged with anything? Should they be dragged into court as well?
    What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Labour - the party of hypocrites.

BBC:20 July 2011:  Q&A: News of the World phone-hacking scandal
The row over phone-hacking by journalists has led to the closure of the News of the World newspaper, and wider questions about press regulation, media ownership, the police, and relationships between politicians and journalists.

The BBC takes a look at the key questions it poses.

How did the scandal arise?

The News of the World (NoW) has been illicitly hacking into the voicemail messages of prominent people to find stories.

It admitted intercepting voicemails in April after years of rumour that the practice was widespread, and amid intense pressure from those who believed they had been victims.

One NoW journalist, royal editor Clive Goodman, was jailed for four months in January 2007, while private investigator Glenn Mulcaire was jailed for six months, after admitting intercepting voicemail messages on royal aides' phones.

The paper ceased publication on 10 July 2011 after fresh allegations. The final edition signed off with headline "Thank you and goodbye" and included an apology.

What was the NoW?

A national Sunday tabloid newspaper published in the UK, famed for celebrity scoops - selling an average of 2.8m copies. Its fondness for sex scandals gained it the nickname "News of the Screws".

The NoW was published by News Group Newspapers, part of News International, which is a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.


Who is alleged to have been hacked?


Police have a list of 4,000 possible targets. Among them are celebrities, sport stars, politicians and victims of crime.

They include actor Hugh Grant, publicist Max Clifford, comedian Steve Coogan, actress Sienna Miller, Lord Prescott, London Mayor Boris Johnson, football pundit Andy Gray and ex-footballer Paul Gascoigne.

Murdered teenager Milly Dowler and the parents of murdered Soham schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman were allegedly targeted. Relatives of dead UK soldiers and relatives of 7/7 victims may also have had their phones hacked.

There also allegations that a police officer offered to sell NoW a contacts book containing details of the royals and their staff.

How did the NoW hack phones?

Mobile phones used to come with a default four-digit Pin. Customers were expected to change their Pin, but very few did.

Tabloid journalists and private investigators could ring the number and if the caller didn't answer, enter the default Pin and access the person's messages.


Why did the NoW hack phones?

For exclusive stories.

Competition is fierce among the national press and, under intense pressure, it is alleged reporters pushed legal boundaries.

How do we know who was being hacked?

The jailing of Goodman and Mulcaire stemmed from a NoW story published in November 2005 about Prince William suffering a knee injury.

Detectives recovered files from Mulcaire's home which referred to a long list of public figures and celebrities.

In 2009, the Guardian newspaper claimed NoW journalists had hacked the phones of up to 3,000 celebrities, politicians and sports stars. Police confirmed the names of some of the suspected victims. Other figures claiming to have had their phones hacked have spoken to the media.


Why does phone hacking matter?

It is against the law. If NoW bosses authorised phone hacking then they could face charges.

But the scandal also prompts wider questions about press regulation and ethics, media ownership, the police, and relationships between politicians and journalists.


What are the victims doing about it?

Several cases have been settled in the courts. Sienna Miller won £100,000 damages and Andy Gray received £20,000. Max Clifford brought a private case and received a reported settlement of £700,000.

Other victims are awaiting the outcome of police investigations or have also launched legal action.
What is the history of the police investigation?

The Metropolitan Police has faced criticism for their initial inquiry in 2006 into phone hacking at the paper.

In 2009 the Met chose not to relaunch their investigation, despite the Guardian's claims. In July 2011 Scotland Yard Assistant Commissioner John Yates expressed "extreme regret" for the decision.

In January 2011 the Met did re-open the investigation. On the same day the NoW sacked Ian Edmondson, an assistant editor, when e-mails relating to phone hacking were allegedly found on the newspaper's systems.

Those arrested and bailed by police as part of the new investigation have included Mr Edmondson, NoW chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck, senior NoW journalist James Weatherup, freelance journalist Terenia Taras, Press Association journalist Laura Elston, an unnamed 63-year-old man, ex-NoW editor Andy Coulson and ex-NoW royal editor Clive Goodman and former News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks.

In July senior Met officers appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee and told MPs that News International had tried to "thwart" the original inquiry into phone hacking at NoW.

Also in July, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson resigned following criticism for hiring former News of the World executive Neil Wallis - who was questioned by police investigating hacking - as an adviser.

Sir Paul said his links to the journalist could hamper current investigations.

The following day, Met Police Assistant Commissioner John Yates resigned from his post after growing pressure on him. He checked the credentials of Neil Wallis before the Met employed the former News of the World executive.

Mr Yates said his conscience was clear and had "deep regret" over his resignation.


How is hacking linked to alleged payments to police?

Commentators and victims accused the police of a lack of will to investigate hacking because officers were too close to the media.

At the beginning of July, News International handed over e-mails which were said to show payments were made to police in return for information, and they were alleged to have been authorised by Mr Coulson.

Met Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson said a small number of officers were alleged to have taken illegal payments, and if true, they would face a criminal court.


What has the government done?

The prime minister has promised two inquiries - one into phone hacking and one looking at newspaper ethics. He said the Press Complaints Commission should be scrapped.

News Corporation boss Mr Murdoch has been asked to appear before the CMS Committee on 19 July, along with James Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks. It is not clear whether Mrs Brooks will now appear following her arrest.

The government, and the previous Labour administration, have been accused of being slow to react.

After the Guardian's claims in 2009, the CMS committee interviewed News International bosses, including Mr Coulson, over the hacking accusations.

In its report in February 2010, the committee accused NoW of "collective amnesia" over phone hacking but MPs found no evidence bosses were aware of hacking.

How has News International responded to the scandal?

Rebekah Brooks, editor of the NoW at the time of the alleged hacking of Milly Dowler's phone, has resigned from her job as chief executive of News International.

Les Hinton, one of the top executives of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, has also quit.

Mr Hinton, chief executive of the media group's Dow Jones, was head of News International from 1995-2007, a period in which the NoW was hacking phones.

News Corp boss Rupert Murdoch issued an apology for the "serious wrongdoing" by the NoW, in UK national newspaper adverts.

News International initially put Goodman's conviction down to the work of one "rogue reporter".

But in April it admitted hacking was used and issued an apology. It has made several payouts.

The company has welcomed an inquiry and said it was co-operating with the police investigation.

On 19 July 2011, Rupert Murdoch, James Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks gave evidence to the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee and denied knowing the full extent of the allegations until evidence in civil cases was requested in late 2010.

Mrs Brooks said the company had then acted "quickly and decisively" in dealing with phone-hacking.

Rupert Murdoch said he had "clearly" been misled by some of his staff, while James Murdoch said the company was "determined to put things right".


What about Andy Coulson? 

Mr Coulson was editor when Goodman and Mulcaire were convicted. He resigned, saying he took responsibility for something that had happened on his watch.

But in November 2010 detectives interviewed Mr Coulson as a witness - and two months later he quit his post at Downing Street, citing coverage of the scandal.

In July this year he was arrested and police searched his south London home.

These events led to questions about the judgement of David Cameron. Asked if he had "screwed up" on the decision to employ Mr Coulson, Mr Cameron said: "People will decide."

Also in July, Sean Hoare, a former News of the World journalist who made phone-hacking allegations against the paper, was found dead.

Mr Hoare had told the BBC's Panorama that phone hacking was "endemic" at the newspaper and that Andy Coulson, then its editor, had asked him to hack phones - something Mr Coulson has denied.


What about BSkyB?

News Corporation owns 39% of broadcaster BSkyB, and Rupert Murdoch wanted to take over the remainder of the company.

But following the phone-hacking scandal News Corp announced it was dropping its planned bid.

MPs from all parties welcomed the decision, with Labour leader Ed Miliband calling it "a victory for people up and down this country who have been appalled by the revelations of the phone hacking scandal and the failure of News International to take responsibility".

The BBC's business editor Robert Peston, who broke the story, said it was a "huge humiliation" for News Corp.


Police Admit Mistakes In Rape Case 
June 15, 2011 4:03 PM - Written by Jason Farrell

Suffolk Police has apologised to an alleged rape victim for the poor handling of her case.

Anita Grinham claims she was taken home and raped after her drink was spiked on a night out in Ipswich in July 2008.

Sky News featured Anita's case as part of an investigation into how victims were being let down by police and the criminal justice system....

The old phone hidden in the shampoo trick 
May 05, 2011 3:41 PM - Written by Jason Farrell

The black-market sale of phones in British prisons is thriving. Several hundred phones are seized every month from inmates. Recently, Sky Investigations highlighted the problem.

We used mobile phone footage from a prisoner’s phone to illustrate how they can then be used to arrange drug drops inside the prison walls.

The Prison Officers Association was unhappy with us suggesting that some wardens might be complicit in bringing the phones into prisons....

On stage, Murdoch plays up humility, regret

Tuesday 19 July 2011
* Rupert Murdoch says most humble day of his life
* Murdoch looks nervous, contrite and apologetic
* Son James confident and fluent, but both evade questions
(Adds Brooks' appearance)
LONDON, July 19 (Reuters) - Rupert Murdoch called it the most humble day of his life, and he can rarely have looked as ill at ease as he did during Tuesday's parliamentary hearing into the phone hacking scandal that has shaken his media empire.
The 80-year-old press baron spent much of the three-hour hearing with his head bowed, at times staring at the back of his hands on the desk before him, and rarely showed the passion and aggression on which he built his business over six decades.
He answered many questions in monosyllables and frequently left long pauses before uttering short replies, apologising repeatedly for the hacking by his now defunct News of the World newspaper but shedding little light on what went on.
"This is the most humble day of my life," he said early on, interrupting his son James Murdoch, his 38-year-old heir apparent and chairman of News Corporation (NasdaqGS:NWS - news) 's non-U.S. properties.
Looking tired, sometimes annoyed and at others bemused, he displayed little emotion during the session, although he occasionally slapped the desk where he sat taking questions from parliament's media committee.
Even when a protester in the room threw a plate of white foam at Murdoch, he remained calm, if a little shaken. He agreed to complete the session after a short break, this time with his jacket off.
On one of the few occasions he broke into a smile, he was told by the committee that this was no laughing matter.
Other rare moments of emotion came when he described how his father had left him a newspaper in the hope that he would do good, when he spoke of the succession at his business and when he criticised the reporting practices of a rival, the Daily Telegraph, wagging his finger.
Murdoch's answers portrayed him as a man who had infrequent contact with the editors of the newspapers in his News Corporation (BSE: CORPBANK.BO - news) empire, knew little of their daily business and did not get involved in editorial decisions.
"Nobody kept me in the dark, I may have been too lax about asking," he said.
He denied any knowledge of phone hacking or other illegal activities, said he was "shocked, appalled and ashamed" at the alleged hacking of the phone of a murdered schoolgirl and said he had been let down by those around him.
Asked why he had not resigned, he said: "Frankly I'm the best person to clean this up."

MURDOCH  FAMILY LOYALTY

Family loyalty was in evidence when his wife Wendi, who sat just behind her husband throughout the hearing, jumped up quickly to fend off the protester who attacked Murdoch.
When Murdoch stumbled over answers, his son frequently tried to step in, only to be told he must let his father answer the question.
At one point James Murdoch chided his father for gesticulating too much, which apparently went against the instructions of advisers.
In contrast to his father, James' answers seemed more confident, if at times rehearsed, as he denied any knowledge of phone hacking or corruption at the time crimes allegedly happened.
He spoke fluently and articulately but few of his answers are likely to have satisfied the committee. More than once he replied with the phrase: "I have no knowledge of that."
The younger Murdoch tried charm, frequently complimenting the committee members on their questions, and did not raise his voice. But neither could avoid looking evasive and, at times clueless about what went on in their company.
Rebekah Brooks, the News of the World editor at the time some of the alleged hacking occurred, later appeared separately at the hearing and was polite, respectful and thoughtful as she apologised for any crimes the newspaper may have committed.
Brooks, who quit on Friday as chief executive of Murdoch's British newspaper operations, also denied any wrongdoing and dismissed media reports about her friendship Prime Minister David Cameron, saying the relationship was "wholly appropriate".
"I've read many, many allegations about my current relationship with David Cameron, including my extensive horse riding with him each weekend up in Oxfordshire. I have never been horse riding with the prime minister," she said.
(Reporting by Mohammed Abbas; Writing by Timothy Heritage and Mohammed Abbas; Editing by Simon Robinson)

James Murdoch BSkyB role clouded, News Corp shares fall

(Reuters)
  • Companies:B SKY B GROUP

    CHASE CORP

    NEW YORK

  • Topics:International

    Board & Management Changes

    US


    Sinead Cruise and Yinka Adegoke19:56, Monday 18 July 2011
    LONDON/NEW YORK (Xetra: A0DKRK - news) (Reuters) - James Murdoch's future as chairman of British Sky Broadcasting (LSE: BSY.L - news) was thrown into doubt on Monday after minority investors called for a corporate governance health check of its board.
    It is the latest action to weaken James' position and increased the likelihood that his executive role at News Corp could be in jeopardy.
    This could open the door for Chief Operating Officer Chase Carey to be the next chief executive of News Corp instead of James as many investors had been expecting.
    "We think they should review the composition of the BSkyB board and the influence exerted by those with ties to News Corp," one top 10 investor in the British satellite broadcaster told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
    A second top 25 investor in the company said BSkyB's corporate governance remained "tricky" but he denied market chatter that fellow shareholders were determined to drive out Murdoch.
    A series of missteps by James, 38, in handling the scandal are believed to have upset his chances for taking over in the near term.
    "We're looking for the silver lining in all this, and it could be this crisis forces News Corp to clarify its succession plan," said Tuna Amobi, an analyst at Standard & Poor's.
    "Most investors I speak to would love for Chase (AMEX:CCF - news) to be given an even more prominent role," said Amobi.
    News Corp's U.S. shares were down 4.4 percent at $14.94 in afternoon trading on Monday.
    The Australian stock sank to a two-year low after Rebekah Brooks, ex-chief executive of the company's UK arm, News International, was arrested on Sunday and the head of London's Metropolitan Police, Paul Stephenson, quit over the scandal.
    News Corp's Australian shares have declined 18 percent, or nearly A$3, this month as the News of the World hacking scandal engulfed News Corp executives.
    On Monday, the shares fell 7.6 percent to an intraday low of A$13.65, the weakest since July 2009,
    The company's market capitalisation has lost more than $6 billion in value since the phone hacking scandal erupted on July 4 in the UK.
    "I think people would rather be cautious and mark it down rather than find a reason to defend it," said Invesco (NYSE: IVZ - news) senior investment manager Jackson Leung in Melbourne. Invesco is News Corp's second-largest institutional shareholder with a 1.68 percent stake, according to Thomson Reuters (Toronto: TRI.TO - news) data.
    Shares in a News Corp takeover target, pay-tv company Austar , also fell on worries the deal may not proceed. The furore in Britain forced News Corp to drop a $12 billion plan to buy all of highly profitable UK pay-TV broadcaster BSkyB .
    BSkyB's credit default swaps spreads widened as the deal with News Corp fell apart, underperforming the Baa1 group median. The company's 5-year CDS (SNP: ^CDSYnews) spread widened by 18 basis points to 93 basis points.
    Robert Eckerstrom, senior analyst for Moody's Capital Markets Research Group, said in a report that investors should consider selling protection on BSkyB's CDS or buying its bonds at current levels.
    Austar has agreed a $2 billion-plus takeover offer from its bigger rival Foxtel, which is owned by News Corp's News Ltd division, billionaire James Packer's Consolidated Media Holdings , and telecom company Telstra .
    Last week, the Australian government said it may review media laws and ownership, following pressure from the influential Greens party.
    Murdoch's News Ltd dominates the Australian newspaper industry, commanding nearly three-quarters of daily metropolitan newspaper circulation, and the UK scandal has riveted attention in his homeland.
    Murdoch, who now has U.S. citizenship, started his global media empire in Adelaide when he inherited the now defunct Adelaide News from his father, Sir Keith Murdoch.
    Austar closed down 3.8 percent while Consolidated Media fell 2.9 percent, against a flat broader market, reflecting investor concerns on the future of the deal.
    Still, the Austar and Foxtel camps and banking sources familiar with the deal said the offer was on track and did not expect it to be derailed because Foxtel is only 25 percent owned by News Corp.
    Australia's competition watchdog is due to rule on the bid for Austar on July 21.
    Reuters is a competitor of Dow Jones Newswires, the financial news agency that News Corp acquired along with the Wall Street Journal in 2007.
    (Reporting by Victoria Thieberger in Melbourne, Sinead Cruise in London, Yinka Adegoke in New York; Additional reporting by Michael Erman in New York and Sonali Paul in Melbourne; Editing by David Cowell)

BSkyB Chairman James Murdoch, News Corp Chief Executive and Chairman Rupert Murdoch appear before a parliamentary committee at Portcullis House in LondonBSkyB Chairman James Murdoch, News Corp 

Murdoch spoke honestly: Saudi Prince Alwaleed AFP via Yahoo! UK & Ireland 

James Murdoch BSkyB role clouded
Reuters via Yahoo! UK & 









































Glenn Mulcaire may tell all now that payments 
from News International have stopped


Glenn Mulcaire may tell all  
News of the World's secrets as payments stop
  • Lucy Carne 
  • From:Herald Sun  
  • July 22, 2011 

THE private investigator at the heart of the phone hacking scandal has hinted he may lift the lid on the 'News of the World's' secrets.
Glenn Mulcaire, 40, was on an alleged $160,000 annual contract to supply the paper with phone numbers used to hack the voicemails of celebrities, politicians, murder victims, including schoolgirl Milly Dowler, and people killed in the Middle East and terrorism attacks.
Despite being arrested and jailed for his role in phone hacking, Mr Mulcaire's legal fees were paid by News of the World publisher News International.
But less than 24 hours after News International's James Murdoch dramatically revealed to British MPs that Mr Mulcaire was being financially supported, the company said it had stopped all payments to the convicted hacker.
After news of the ceased payments broke yesterday, the father of five broke his silence.
"As you can appreciate, we are in the middle of a number of inquiries at the moment," Mr Mulcaire said.
"It's a very fluid and developing situation. Like I said, the developments have been different from day to day and I have no further comment to make at this stage.
"However, this may change."
James Murdoch denied allegations that Mulcaire's legal payments were hush money, telling MPs he was "as surprised as you are" when he discovered certain legal fees were paid to Mr Mulcaire by News International, a sister company to News Ltd, publisher of theHerald Sun.
Mr Mulcaire reportedly faces about 24 potential civil law suits from alleged hacking victims. Files seized by police allegedly reveal Mr Mulcaire had more than 4000 names on a list of potential hacking victims.
The High Court yesterday ruled Scotland Yard must hand over police information to actor Hugh Grant and his ex-girlfriend Jemima Khan showing that their phone messages might have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire.
Speculation was rampant on Twitter that Princess Diana was also a phone-hacking victim.
Tom Mockridge, the New Zealander who last week replaced Rebekah Brooks as News International's chief executive, slammed News of the World phone hackers as lazy, corrupt and having "fake scoops".
He told staff at the Times an internal phone-hacking probe would look at other News International titles.

  • Net widens in UK hacking probe The Australian18 minutes ago
  • News 'thwarted hacking probe'Herald Sun1 day ago
  • Charges over Murdoch pie attackHerald Sun1 day ago
  • Composed Brooks says she was unaware The Australian1 day ago
  • PM defends aide in hacking scandalHerald Sun2 days ago
    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/net-widens-in-uk-hacking-probe/story-e6frg996-1226099352272

    murdoch NOTW
    News Corporation Chief Rupert Murdoch reads a copy of one his newspapers, The London Times, as he leaves his London home yesterday. Source: AFP

    Net widens in UK hacking probe

    • Peter Wilson, Europe correspondent 
    • From:The Australian 
    • July 22, 2011 
    • SCOTLAND Yard appears to be widening its investigation into voicemail hacking beyond Rupert Murdoch's defunct News of the World to take in other British newspapers.
    The rapidly expanding police task force investigating the scandal has asked for material gathered by a 2003 Information Commission inquiry, which found that journalists from across Fleet Street used private detectives to help gather information.
    While private investigators do some legitimate work for newspapers, police believe they have also performed illegal acts, such as the hacking of telephones by investigator Glenn Mulcaire, which led him and a News of the World reporter to be sent to jail in 2007.
    Information Commissioner Christopher Graham, who is responsible for overseeing laws
    on data protection and freedom of information, told the BBC that his office had given the police the files of Operation Motorman, an inquiry that seized thousands of pages detailing a private detective's often illegal work for 31 publications.
    The investigation found the Daily Mail had made the most requests, followed by the Sunday People and the Daily Mirror. "The whole Motorman file has been put at the disposal of the Metropolitan Police Operation Weeting, which is looking into the hacking allegations," he said. "It is a rich source of possibly corroborative evidence in some cases."
    Senior police announced yesterday that they had expanded from 45 to 60 the number of police on the case, following complaints by MPs that the police had so far contacted only 170 of up to 12,800 people who may have had their phone messages intercepted by Mulcaire.
    Piers Morgan, the former Daily Mirror editor who is now a CNN television host, was dragged into the affair this week.
    Conservative MP Louise Mensch told a parliamentary committee that Morgan had boasted in his memoirs that when he was editor, the Mirror used phone hacking to get a story that won a "scoop of the year" award.
    Morgan vehemently denied the claim, pointing out that he had indicated in his memoirs only that he learned about "the little trick" of phone hacking and had changed his own phone's password to protect his privacy.
    Mr Mulcaire yesterday indicated that he was looking forward to speaking publicly about his work for News's British newspapers. This followed Mr Murdoch's rapid delivery on his promise to a parliamentary committee on Tuesday to stop his company paying legal fees for Mr Mulcaire.
    Mr Murdoch's son James, the chairman of News International, had confirmed the firm was still paying legal expenses for Mr Mulcaire, who had been identified as the man who hacked into the messages of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler in 2002.
    Labour MPs claimed the payments were meant to silence Mr Mulcaire, and the Dowler family's lawyer said they were outraged to learn that despite Rupert Murdoch's apology for the intrusion into Milly's voice messages, the company had kept funding Mr Mulcaire's legal team.
    Mr Mulcaire's lawyers have been resisting efforts by hacking victims to disclose information about his activities, and the end of News' funding apparently means he will be free to speak out.
    The private investigator told reporters outside his home yesterday that he did not want to comment yet but "that will change".
    News International also gave one of its law firms, Harbottle & Lewis, a partial exemption from its duty of client confidentiality so the law firm could answer questions from police and MPs about its role in the company's decision not to probe deeper several years ago.
    James Murdoch told MPs on Tuesday that advice from the law firm had contributed to the company's conclusion that phone hacking was not widespread, prompting the law firm to ask to be released from its duty of client confidentiality so it could respond to any inaccurate statements and to explain events in 2007.





    The Age may have broken law: minister


    FEDERAL Justice Minister Brendan O'Connor has suggested Melbourne's The Age newspaper may have broken the law by accessing a Labor Party database during last year's Victorian state election.
    Mr O'Connor, asked by Melbourne radio 3AW's Neil Mitchell what conduct by journalists would be prohibited by the government's proposed privacy laws, said there were "a number of laws" already in place to prevent the improper accessing of information.
    Asked whether the decision by senior editors and journalists from The Age to access the database without ALP authorisation and download the private details of voters would run foul of the proposed privacy regime, Mr O'Connor responded: "I won't comment on a particular matter because I don't have the facts before me.
    "I will say this though: if information is being privately held and an organisation breaches it or takes it improperly or unlawfully, clearly there are a number of laws that are offended there.
    "We do have laws in place to protect the interests of privacy and certain matters.
    "What we don't have is any certainty whether there is civil redress when a person's privacy has been seriously invaded and that's why we want to have this discussion."
    Editor-in-chief of The Age Paul Ramadge did not respond last night to Mr O'Connor's comments. The Age has said it gained access through a party whistleblower with an authorised log-on.
    The Australian Federal Police is assessing whether the Fairfax newspaper may have breached the Cybercrime Act 2001.
    Victorian ALP secretary Noah Carroll made it clear to The Australian last week that The Age did not have permission to access the system. The Age reported information gained from its unauthorised access on its front page the week before the election was won by Ted Baillieu's Coalition.



    Escape clause for rich and powerful

    • Matt Johnston and Carly Crawford 
    • From:Herald Sun 
    • July 22, 2011 
    PROPOSED new privacy laws could stop the media investigating corruption.
    The Lara Bingle nude photo case and the Defence skype sex scandal are scenarios new laws could cover.
    But media law experts say rich and powerful people could abuse such protections to stymie legitimate investigative journalism.
    Privacy Minister Brendan O'Connor said his department had begun reviewing recommendations by the Australian Law Reform Commission to enshrine in law an explicit right to privacy.
    It comes after the News of the World scandal in the UK, where phones were hacked.
    Australia has no specific right to privacy law, but has privacy-protecting laws such as defamation, trespass and restrictions on the use of surveillance devices.
    The former head of the Australian Press Council, David Flint, said privacy legislation could harm Australia's media freedom.
    Mr Flint, now an emeritus professor of law at the University of Technology Sydney, said the people who would take advantage of the law would be the "rich and powerful".
    "They would use that to stop investigation of legitimate matters of public interest," he said.
    Media law expert and HWL Ebsworth partner Nicholas Pullen said such changes would be difficult to regulate and could stifle journalism.
    Mr O'Connor said a review was appropriate.
    "People need remedies if their privacy has been violated," he said.

    "This Government strongly believes in the principle of freedom of expression and also the right to privacy.
    "Any changes to our laws will have to strike a balance between the two ideals."
    Opposition communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull said it was reasonable to have a debate about privacy in light of rapidly evolving technology.
    But Opposition Leader Tony Abbott warned the Gillard Government against a "thinly veiled attempt to intimidate the press".
    Complaints about invasion of privacy constitute only a fraction of those lodged against the Australian press. A Herald Sun investigation of complaints statistics found just 21 out of 529 complaints made to the press council last year were about privacy invasion.

    Privacy tort 'will shield rich and powerful'

    • Lawyer Justin Quill, who acts for News Limited and other media companies, predicted the new privacy tort would strangle press freedom while shielding the rich and powerful from scrutiny.
      "There's no doubt in my mind. This is a law for politicians -- the rich and the famous and politicians," he said.
      This week, the government announced formal consultations on an Australian Law Reform Commission proposal to give people the right of redress in the courts for serious breaches of privacy.
      Privacy Minister Brendan O'Connor said the public would expect the government to look again at the use of private information, given the "reprehensible behaviour" seen in the News of the World scandal.
      But media law expert Nicholas Pullen warned against "knee-jerk" political reaction to the crimes committed at the British tabloid.
      He said a statutory right to privacy could stifle investigative journalism, and called for the government to return to first principles and define what it meant by privacy.
      "What we need is a reasoned and balanced debate and not something in the shadow of something that's happening overseas," he said.
      Andrew Stewart, head of the Australian media and content group at Baker & McKenzie, said there were already sufficient privacy protections in media codes of practice, trespass and telecommunications laws.
      If the right to privacy was enshrined in law, as proposed, "then it's going to have to be a balanced approach and there must also be an explicit recognition of the freedom of information and the freedom of speech", Mr Stewart said.

      Undoing free speech a sop to placate Bob

      • THE federal government seems intent on allowing the Greens to destroy Labor's credentials on free speech.
        After permitting the Greens to vandalise the federal shield law for journalists' sources, the government has decided to embrace the thinking of the Greens on privacy law.
        This will have the effect of reversing privacy law reforms that were enacted by Labor state governments just six years ago.
        It will also leave federal Labor even further removed from the grand plans for transparency and accountability that were contained in the party's 2007 election platform.
        In its rush to placate Bob Brown, federal Labor has forgotten that Labor state governments took a completely different position in the last debate over privacy.
        In 2005, when privacy was debated during the push for national defamation laws, every Labor state lined up on the free-speech side of the argument.
        What a pity Julia Gillard and Privacy Minister Brendan O'Connor are prepared to repudiate that proud Labor history. Unless federal Labor returns to its roots and rids itself of the Greens influence, its plans for a statutory privacy tort will brand Labor as the party that wound back free speech. Labor was already struggling on this front. Its 2007 policy promised a new era of open government based on real protection for whistleblowers in the federal public service.
        It's been a while: where is Labor's draft legislation?
        The same policy invoked the name of convicted whistleblower Allan Kessing as an example of one wrong that needed righting.
        For more than a year, O'Connor has had a pardon application from Kessing. For almost six months, O'Connor has known about growing doubts about Kessing's conviction because evidence was withheld from his defence team.
        The lack of action on these key issues had already fed doubts about Labor's direction. That direction now looks like reverse.
        A privacy tort is clearly aimed at intimidating the media, particularly News Limited, publisher of The Australian, the newspaper Brown loves to hate.
        The effect will be to raise the cost of doing business for the entire media industry. The privacy lobby is dominated by lawyers for a reason: a privacy tort would be a rich vein for lawyers.
        It would replace much of the legal work that was lost when the privacy elements in the defamation defence of truth were removed back in 2005.
        Since those changes, the media has known that if it publishes the truth it will be protected from defamation. Before those changes, defamation operated as a quasi-privacy tort. By reversing that, the costs of running a media business will grow. That will raise the barriers to entry and entrench the position of existing media outlets such as The Australian.

        News of the World hacking latest - hacking prompts privacy crackdown

        News Corp Murdoch
        Home... Rupert Murdoch at his Fifth Avenue residence in New York yesterday.Source: AP
          • THE Gillard Government is moving to a privacy law crackdown, prompted by the News of the World scandal
              • The Government will revisit three-year-old recommendations made by the Australian Law Reform Commission which proposed tougher privacy laws.
                The commission has recommended introducing a "general right to privacy", enabling people to sue for breaches - a reform that has been criticised as undermining free speech.
                Privacy Minister Brendan O'Connor said yesterday "clearly what we want to do is to ensure that individuals or organisations do not seriously invade the privacy of others".
                "People need remedies if they have been violated, if their privacy has been violated," he told Sky News.
                "Right now there is no general right to privacy in Australia, and that means there's no certainty for anyone wanting to sue for an invasion of their privacy.
                      • "The News of the World scandal and other recent mass breaches of privacy, both at home and abroad, have put the spotlight on whether there should be such a right."
                        The renewed focus on privacy reforms came after Prime Minister Julia Gillard linked the phone hacking scandal which ultimately led to the closure of the News of the World to News Limited's Australian publications.
                        On Wednesday, Ms Gillard said that Australians had been disturbed by the UK events and would have "hard questions" to ask of News Limited, the owner of The Advertiser, over the UK scandal, but did not say what those questions should be.
                        "Australians watching all of that happening overseas with News Corp are looking at News Limited here and wanting to see News Limited answer some hard questions," she said.
                        The Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, yesterday told the Prime Minister to "put up or shut up".
                        "The Prime Minister must specify exactly what those questions are and if she can't specify exactly what those questions are, what she's doing is just smearing a perfectly good organisation," he said.
                        "The last thing I want to do is to support anything which is a thinly veiled attempt to intimidate the press.
                        "There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the practices, the reprehensible practices, that we saw at one newspaper in England have any currency here in Australia."
                        News Limited has appointed two former Victorian supreme court judges to assess its review of editorial spending over the past three years to confirm that payments made to third parties were for legitimate services.
                        The scandal has forced Mr Murdoch to close down the News of the World , claimed the jobs of two top aides and rocked his News Corporation empire while also forcing two senior British policemen to resign

                        News of the World hacking latest - hacking prompts privacy crackdown